From: Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoudere@collabora.co.uk>
To: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>,
Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@collabora.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"open list:USB PHY LAYER" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] usb-phy-generic: Add support to SMSC USB3315
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 19:36:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1496770570.22734.3.camel@collabora.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170606015528.GB26189@b29397-desktop>
Hi Peter,
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 09:55 +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Fabien Lahoudere wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 17:43 +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 10:57:00AM +0200, Fabien Lahoudere wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 15:00 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > > On 05/26, Fabien Lahoudere wrote:
> > > > > > Hello
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I modify ci_hrdc_imx_probe to bypass "data->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev-
> > > > > > >dev,
> > > > > > "fsl,usbphy", 0);". Everything works as expected and call ci_ulpi_init.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The problem is that in ci_ulpi_init, before calling "ci->ulpi =
> > > > > > ulpi_register_interface(ci-
> > > > > > > dev,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > &ci->ulpi_ops);" (to initialize our phy), "hw_phymode_configure(ci);" is called which is
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > original function that make our system to hang.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Our phy is not initialised before calling ulpi_register_interface so I don't understand
> > > > > > how
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > phy
> > > > > > can reply if it is not out of reset state.
> > > > >
> > > > > I haven't see any problem in hw_phymode_configure(). What's the
> > > > > value of ci->platdata->phy_mode? USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI? If
> > > > > you phy needs to be taken out of reset to reply to the ulpi reads
> > > > > of the vendor/product ids, then it sounds like you have a similar
> > > > > situation to what I had. I needed to turn on some regulators to
> > > > > get those reads to work, otherwise they would fail, but knowing
> > > > > what needed to be turned on basically meant I needed to probe the
> > > > > ulpi driver so probing the ids wasn't going to be useful. So on
> > > > > my device the reads for the ids go through, but they get all
> > > > > zeroes back, which is actually ok because there aren't any bits
> > > > > set on my devices anyway. After the reads see 0, we fallback to
> > > > > DT matching, which avoids the "bring it out of reset/power it on"
> > > > > sorts of problems entirely.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes the phy mode is configured to USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI.
> > > > Indeed, this phy need to be out of reset to work. For example everything works fine if I
> > > > call
> > > > "_ci_usb_phy_init(ci);" before calling "hw_phymode_configure(ci);"
> > > > This function only init reset GPIO and clock.
> > > >
> > > > For information, the original patch I have to fix the issue:
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > > > index 79ad8e9..21aaff1 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > > > @@ -391,6 +391,7 @@ static int ci_usb_phy_init(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
> > > > case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_UTMI:
> > > > case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_UTMIW:
> > > > case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_HSIC:
> > > > + case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI:
> > > > ret = _ci_usb_phy_init(ci);
> > > > if (!ret)
> > > > hw_wait_phy_stable();
> > > > @@ -398,7 +399,6 @@ static int ci_usb_phy_init(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
> > > > return ret;
> > > > hw_phymode_configure(ci);
> > > > break;
> > > > - case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI:
> > > > case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SERIAL:
> > > > hw_phymode_configure(ci);
> > > > ret = _ci_usb_phy_init(ci);
> > > > --
> > >
> > > Currently, the hw_phymode_configure is called twice for ULPI PHY, the
> > > two execution are between _ci_usb_phy_init, would you test which one
> > > causes hang? If the second causes hang, you can make a patch for
> > > hw_phymode_configure that if the required PORTSC_PTS is the same
> > > the value in register, do noop.
> >
> > The first one hangs, _ci_usb_phy_init is not called due to hang.
> >
>
> So, you need to comment out hw_phymode_configure at ci_ulpi_init, and you
> can't get vid/pid correctly, right? If it is, we may need to add power on
> sequence at chipidea core driver (ci_hdrc_probe) for clock and reset things.
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg157134.html
>
> I am wondering if we can call ci_usb_phy_init before calling ci_ulpi_init,
> since we need to let hardware be ready before reading vid/pid.
> Stephen & Fabien, does that work for you?
>
I test the following patch and it works. But I am not sure that we can move safely ci_ulpi_init.
I will investigate more tomorrow if it is a problem for other phys.
Is it a good approach?
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] power on phy before getting vid/pid
Signed-off-by: Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoudere@collabora.co.uk>
---
drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c | 12 ++++++++----
drivers/usb/chipidea/ulpi.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
index 79ad8e9..26889e1 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
@@ -879,10 +879,6 @@ static int ci_hdrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENODEV;
}
- ret = ci_ulpi_init(ci);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
if (ci->platdata->phy) {
ci->phy = ci->platdata->phy;
} else if (ci->platdata->usb_phy) {
@@ -909,6 +905,14 @@ static int ci_hdrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ci->usb_phy = NULL;
}
+ /*
+ We move this in order to have phy reset and gpio information
+ before calling ci_ulpi_init.
+ */
+ ret = ci_ulpi_init(ci);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
ret = ci_usb_phy_init(ci);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "unable to init phy: %d\n", ret);
diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ulpi.c
index 1219583..1c272e4 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ulpi.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ulpi.c
@@ -73,9 +73,28 @@ static int ci_ulpi_write(struct device *dev, u8 addr, u8 val)
int ci_ulpi_init(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
{
+ int ret;
if (ci->platdata->phy_mode != USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI)
return 0;
+ /*
+ This is the content of _ci_usb_phy_init from core.c to power on the phy.
+ Duplicated for test purpose only.
+ */
+ if (ci->phy) {
+ ret = phy_init(ci->phy);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = phy_power_on(ci->phy);
+ if (ret) {
+ phy_exit(ci->phy);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ } else {
+ ret = usb_phy_init(ci->usb_phy);
+ }
+
/*
* Set PORTSC correctly so we can read/write ULPI registers for
* identification purposes
--
1.8.3.1
Thanks
Fabien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-06 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-19 6:14 [RFC] usb-phy-generic: Add support to SMSC USB3315 Peter Senna Tschudin
2017-04-19 10:03 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2017-04-19 10:24 ` Peter Senna Tschudin
2017-04-19 17:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2017-04-20 8:50 ` Peter Chen
2017-05-23 18:16 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-05-23 21:00 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-05-25 10:36 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-05-26 9:00 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-06-02 22:00 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-05 8:57 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-06-05 9:43 ` Peter Chen
2017-06-05 9:52 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-06-06 1:55 ` Peter Chen
2017-06-06 17:36 ` Fabien Lahoudere [this message]
2017-06-07 1:43 ` Peter Chen
2017-06-07 15:00 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-06-08 12:27 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-06-09 8:26 ` Peter Chen
2017-06-09 11:17 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-06-12 1:20 ` Peter Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1496770570.22734.3.camel@collabora.co.uk \
--to=fabien.lahoudere@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=peter.senna@collabora.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).