From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751955AbdFHOEa (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:04:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14310 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751597AbdFHNrg (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:47:36 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 228127E9FB Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dhowells@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 228127E9FB Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 Subject: [PATCH 02/23] security: use READ_ONCE instead of deprecated ACCESS_ONCE From: David Howells To: jmorris@namei.org Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 14:47:34 +0100 Message-ID: <149692965438.11452.17954613433247309012.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <149692963884.11452.7673998701432248814.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <149692963884.11452.7673998701432248814.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> User-Agent: StGit/0.17.1-dirty MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Thu, 08 Jun 2017 13:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Davidlohr Bueso With the new standardized functions, we can replace all ACCESS_ONCE() calls across relevant security/keyrings/. ACCESS_ONCE() does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145 Update the new calls regardless of if it is a scalar type, this is cleaner than having three alternatives. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso Signed-off-by: David Howells --- security/keys/keyring.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/keys/keyring.c b/security/keys/keyring.c index 4d1678e4586f..de81793f9920 100644 --- a/security/keys/keyring.c +++ b/security/keys/keyring.c @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring, * Non-keyrings avoid the leftmost branch of the root entirely (root * slots 1-15). */ - ptr = ACCESS_ONCE(keyring->keys.root); + ptr = READ_ONCE(keyring->keys.root); if (!ptr) goto not_this_keyring; @@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring, if ((shortcut->index_key[0] & ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_MASK) != 0) goto not_this_keyring; - ptr = ACCESS_ONCE(shortcut->next_node); + ptr = READ_ONCE(shortcut->next_node); node = assoc_array_ptr_to_node(ptr); goto begin_node; } @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring, if (assoc_array_ptr_is_shortcut(ptr)) { shortcut = assoc_array_ptr_to_shortcut(ptr); smp_read_barrier_depends(); - ptr = ACCESS_ONCE(shortcut->next_node); + ptr = READ_ONCE(shortcut->next_node); BUG_ON(!assoc_array_ptr_is_node(ptr)); } node = assoc_array_ptr_to_node(ptr); @@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring, ascend_to_node: /* Go through the slots in a node */ for (; slot < ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_OUT; slot++) { - ptr = ACCESS_ONCE(node->slots[slot]); + ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]); if (assoc_array_ptr_is_meta(ptr) && node->back_pointer) goto descend_to_node; @@ -790,13 +790,13 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring, /* We've dealt with all the slots in the current node, so now we need * to ascend to the parent and continue processing there. */ - ptr = ACCESS_ONCE(node->back_pointer); + ptr = READ_ONCE(node->back_pointer); slot = node->parent_slot; if (ptr && assoc_array_ptr_is_shortcut(ptr)) { shortcut = assoc_array_ptr_to_shortcut(ptr); smp_read_barrier_depends(); - ptr = ACCESS_ONCE(shortcut->back_pointer); + ptr = READ_ONCE(shortcut->back_pointer); slot = shortcut->parent_slot; } if (!ptr)