From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752134AbdFOT6u (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 15:58:50 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:7293 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751644AbdFOT6t (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 15:58:49 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,344,1493708400"; d="scan'208";a="114961666" Message-ID: <1497556728.133434.5.camel@ranerica-desktop> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 16/26] x86/insn-eval: Support both signed 32-bit and 64-bit effective addresses From: Ricardo Neri To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Brian Gerst , Chris Metcalf , Dave Hansen , Paolo Bonzini , Masami Hiramatsu , Huang Rui , Jiri Slaby , Jonathan Corbet , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paul Gortmaker , Vlastimil Babka , Chen Yucong , Alexandre Julliard , Stas Sergeev , Fenghua Yu , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org, Adam Buchbinder , Colin Ian King , Lorenzo Stoakes , Qiaowei Ren , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Adrian Hunter , Kees Cook , Thomas Garnier , Dmitry Vyukov Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:58:48 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170607154924.ddvy6mwojvnjqp6k@pd.tnic> References: <20170505181724.55000-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <20170505181724.55000-17-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <20170607154924.ddvy6mwojvnjqp6k@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 17:49 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:17:14AM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote: > > @@ -697,18 +753,21 @@ void __user *insn_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs) > > { > > unsigned long linear_addr, seg_base_addr, seg_limit; > > long eff_addr, base, indx; > > - int addr_offset, base_offset, indx_offset; > > + int addr_offset, base_offset, indx_offset, addr_bytes; > > insn_byte_t sib; > > > > insn_get_modrm(insn); > > insn_get_sib(insn); > > sib = insn->sib.value; > > + addr_bytes = insn->addr_bytes; > > > > if (X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) == 3) { > > addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM); > > if (addr_offset < 0) > > goto out_err; > > - eff_addr = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset); > > + eff_addr = get_mem_offset(regs, addr_offset, addr_bytes); > > + if (eff_addr == -1L) > > + goto out_err; > > seg_base_addr = insn_get_seg_base(regs, insn, addr_offset); > > if (seg_base_addr == -1L) > > goto out_err; > > This code here is too dense, it needs spacing for better readability. I have spaced out in my upcoming version. Thanks and BR, Ricardo