From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755114AbdFXXp5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2017 19:45:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35630 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752336AbdFXXp4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2017 19:45:56 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com EFB7581227 Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=riel@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com EFB7581227 Message-ID: <1498347954.13083.40.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched,numa: override part of migrate_degrades_locality when idle balancing From: Rik van Riel To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jhladky@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de, peterz@infradead.org Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 19:45:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170624065830.tuyznoakmzoekvdh@gmail.com> References: <20170623165530.22514-1-riel@redhat.com> <20170623165530.22514-2-riel@redhat.com> <20170624065830.tuyznoakmzoekvdh@gmail.com> Organization: Red Hat, Inc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Sat, 24 Jun 2017 23:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2017-06-24 at 08:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * riel@redhat.com wrote: > > > From: Rik van Riel > > > > Several tests in the NAS benchmark seem to run a lot slower with > > NUMA balancing enabled, than with NUMA balancing disabled. The > > slower run time corresponds with increased idle time. > > > > Overriding the final test of migrate_degrades_locality (but still > > doing the other NUMA tests first) seems to improve performance > > of those benchmarks. > > > > Reported-by: Jirka Hladky > > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel > > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel > > Note, I removed the first SOB from the commit, assuming that you only > meant to  > include the second one? Thank you. It looks like I used the wrong email address in the SOB I wrote in the patch, and git added the second one automatically. The second one is indeed the one I want.