From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752895AbdF2RJm (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:09:42 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:35440 "EHLO mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752150AbdF2RJk (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:09:40 -0400 From: karthik@techveda.org To: gilad@benyossef.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sunil.m@techveda.org, Karthik Tummala Subject: [PATCH v2] staging: ccree: Use __func__ instead of function name Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:38:45 +0530 Message-Id: <1498756125-3330-1-git-send-email-karthik@techveda.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <20170629141829.GA29662@kroah.com> References: <20170629141829.GA29662@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Karthik Tummala Fixed following checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using the function's name, in a string It is prefered to use '%s & __func__' instead of function name for logging. Signed-off-by: Karthik Tummala --- Changes for v2: v1 was a patch series, which consisted of two patches in which second one was already submitted by Gilad Ben-Yossef, so dropped that one. Patch generated on staging-testing as suggested by Greg-K H. --- drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_aead.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_aead.c b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_aead.c index 1fc0b05..1168161 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_aead.c +++ b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_aead.c @@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ static int config_gcm_context(struct aead_request *req) (req->cryptlen - ctx->authsize); __be32 counter = cpu_to_be32(2); - SSI_LOG_DEBUG("config_gcm_context() cryptlen = %d, req->assoclen = %d ctx->authsize = %d\n", cryptlen, req->assoclen, ctx->authsize); + SSI_LOG_DEBUG("%s() cryptlen = %d, req->assoclen = %d ctx->authsize = %d\n", __func__, cryptlen, req->assoclen, ctx->authsize); memset(req_ctx->hkey, 0, AES_BLOCK_SIZE); @@ -2198,7 +2198,7 @@ static int ssi_rfc4106_gcm_setkey(struct crypto_aead *tfm, const u8 *key, unsign struct ssi_aead_ctx *ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(tfm); int rc = 0; - SSI_LOG_DEBUG("ssi_rfc4106_gcm_setkey() keylen %d, key %p\n", keylen, key); + SSI_LOG_DEBUG("%s() keylen %d, key %p\n", __func__, keylen, key); if (keylen < 4) return -EINVAL; @@ -2216,7 +2216,7 @@ static int ssi_rfc4543_gcm_setkey(struct crypto_aead *tfm, const u8 *key, unsign struct ssi_aead_ctx *ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(tfm); int rc = 0; - SSI_LOG_DEBUG("ssi_rfc4543_gcm_setkey() keylen %d, key %p\n", keylen, key); + SSI_LOG_DEBUG("%s() keylen %d, key %p\n", __func__, keylen, key); if (keylen < 4) return -EINVAL; -- 1.9.1