From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752934AbcFISYZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:24:25 -0400 Received: from mail.eperm.de ([89.247.134.16]:36174 "EHLO mail.eperm.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751469AbcFISYW (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:24:22 -0400 From: Stephan Mueller To: Mat Martineau Cc: Tadeusz Struk , dhowells@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, marcel@holtmann.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, davem@davemloft.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] crypto: AF_ALG -- add asymmetric cipher interface Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 20:24:17 +0200 Message-ID: <1499283.NSekfIF0FQ@tauon.atsec.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.4.9-300.fc23.x86_64; KDE/4.14.20; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20160515041645.15888.94903.stgit@tstruk-mobl1> <8115473.hELPVzZyL0@tauon.atsec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2016, 11:18:04 schrieb Mat Martineau: Hi Mat, > > Or is your concern that the user space interface restricts things too much > > and thus prevents a valid use case? > > The latter - my primary concern is the constraint this places on userspace > by forcing larger buffer sizes than might be necessary for the operation. > struct akcipher_request has separate members for src_len and dst_len, and > dst_len is documented as needing "to be at least as big as the expected > result depending on the operation". Not the maximum result, the expected > result. It's also documented that the cipher will generate an error if > dst_len is insufficient and update the value with the required size. > > I'm updating some userspace TLS code that worked with an earlier, unmerged > patch set for AF_ALG akcipher (from last year). The read calls with > shorter buffers were the main porting problem. I see -- are you proposing to drop that check entirely? Ciao Stephan