From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752831AbdHGJZz (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2017 05:25:55 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45331 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752555AbdHGJZx (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2017 05:25:53 -0400 Message-ID: <1502097950.4007.82.camel@suse.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: adt7475: wusbhc: constify attribute_group structures. From: Jean Delvare To: Arvind Yadav , linux@roeck-us.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 11:25:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Suse Linux Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arvind, On lun., 2017-08-07 at 11:49 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote: > attribute_group are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions > working with attribute_group provided by work with > const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const. Confused by the subject. What is "wusbhc:"? Also please avoid trailing dot in mail subjects. > Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav > --- > drivers/hwmon/adt7475.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/adt7475.c b/drivers/hwmon/adt7475.c > index 1baa213..9ef8499 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/adt7475.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/adt7475.c > @@ -1319,14 +1319,14 @@ static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_2(pwm3_stall_disable, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, > NULL > }; > > -static struct attribute_group adt7475_attr_group = { .attrs = adt7475_attrs }; > -static struct attribute_group fan4_attr_group = { .attrs = fan4_attrs }; > -static struct attribute_group pwm2_attr_group = { .attrs = pwm2_attrs }; > -static struct attribute_group in0_attr_group = { .attrs = in0_attrs }; > -static struct attribute_group in3_attr_group = { .attrs = in3_attrs }; > -static struct attribute_group in4_attr_group = { .attrs = in4_attrs }; > -static struct attribute_group in5_attr_group = { .attrs = in5_attrs }; > -static struct attribute_group vid_attr_group = { .attrs = vid_attrs }; > +static const struct attribute_group adt7475_attr_group = { .attrs = adt7475_attrs }; > +static const struct attribute_group fan4_attr_group = { .attrs = fan4_attrs }; > +static const struct attribute_group pwm2_attr_group = { .attrs = pwm2_attrs }; > +static const struct attribute_group in0_attr_group = { .attrs = in0_attrs }; > +static const struct attribute_group in3_attr_group = { .attrs = in3_attrs }; > +static const struct attribute_group in4_attr_group = { .attrs = in4_attrs }; > +static const struct attribute_group in5_attr_group = { .attrs = in5_attrs }; > +static const struct attribute_group vid_attr_group = { .attrs = vid_attrs }; > > static int adt7475_detect(struct i2c_client *client, > struct i2c_board_info *info) Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support