From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753535AbdHKQMw (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:12:52 -0400 Received: from imap0.codethink.co.uk ([185.43.218.159]:51179 "EHLO imap0.codethink.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752901AbdHKQMu (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:12:50 -0400 Message-ID: <1502467959.2047.32.camel@codethink.co.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 15/58] iscsi-target: Fix initial login PDU asynchronous socket close OOPs From: Ben Hutchings To: Nicholas Bellinger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Mike Christie , Hannes Reinecke , Sagi Grimberg , Varun Prakash , Greg Kroah-Hartman Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:12:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170809194147.115146026@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20170809194146.501519882@linuxfoundation.org> <20170809194147.115146026@linuxfoundation.org> Organization: Codethink Ltd. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 12:41 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > know. > > ------------------ > > From: Nicholas Bellinger > > commit 25cdda95fda78d22d44157da15aa7ea34be3c804 upstream. [...] > --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c > +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c > @@ -489,14 +489,60 @@ static void iscsi_target_restore_sock_ca > > static int iscsi_target_do_login(struct iscsi_conn *, struct iscsi_login *); > > -static bool iscsi_target_sk_state_check(struct sock *sk) > +static bool __iscsi_target_sk_check_close(struct sock *sk) > { > if (sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE_WAIT || sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE) { > - pr_debug("iscsi_target_sk_state_check: TCP_CLOSE_WAIT|TCP_CLOSE," > + pr_debug("__iscsi_target_sk_check_close: TCP_CLOSE_WAIT|TCP_CLOSE," > "returning FALSE\n"); > - return false; > + return true; [...] The log message no longer matches the code. This seems to be unfixed upstream. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Software Developer, Codethink Ltd.