From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
mike.kravetz@oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
colm@allcosts.net, keescook@chromium.org, luto@amacapital.net,
wad@chromium.org, mingo@kernel.org, kirill@shutemov.name,
dave.hansen@intel.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm,fork: introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 12:28:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503073709.6577.68.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170817155033.172cf22ec143713d5cf98b4e@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 15:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:18:19 -0400 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > > > --- a/mm/madvise.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> > > > @@ -80,6 +80,17 @@ static long madvise_behavior(struct
> > > > vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > > __ }
> > > > __ new_flags &= ~VM_DONTCOPY;
> > > > __ break;
> > > > + case MADV_WIPEONFORK:
> > > > + /* MADV_WIPEONFORK is only supported on
> > > > anonymous
> > > > memory. */
> > > > + if (vma->vm_file || vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
> > > > {
> > > > + error = -EINVAL;
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > + }
> > > > + new_flags |= VM_WIPEONFORK;
> > > > + break;
> > > > + case MADV_KEEPONFORK:
> > > > + new_flags &= ~VM_WIPEONFORK;
> > > > + break;
> > > > __ case MADV_DONTDUMP:
> > > > __ new_flags |= VM_DONTDUMP;
> > > > __ break;
> > >
> > > It seems odd to permit MADV_KEEPONFORK against other-than-anon
> > > vmas?
> >
> > Given that the only way to set VM_WIPEONFORK is through
> > MADV_WIPEONFORK, calling MADV_KEEPONFORK on an
> > other-than-anon vma would be equivalent to a noop.
> >
> > If new_flags == vma->vm_flags, madvise_behavior() will
> > immediately exit.
>
> Yes, but calling MADV_WIPEONFORK against an other-than-anon vma is
> presumably a userspace bug. A bug which will probably result in
> userspace having WIPEONFORK memory which it didn't want. The kernel
> can trivially tell userspace that it has this bug so why not do so?
Uh, what?
Calling MADV_WIPEONFORK on an other-than-anon vma results
in NOT getting VM_WIPEONFORK semantics on that VMA.
The code you are commenting on is the bit that CLEARS
the VM_WIPEONFORK code, not the bit where it gets set.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-18 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-11 21:28 [PATCH v4 0/2] mm,fork,security: introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK riel
2017-08-11 21:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86,mpx: make mpx depend on x86-64 to free up VMA flag riel
2017-08-11 21:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm,fork: introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK riel
2017-08-15 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2017-08-16 2:18 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-17 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2017-08-18 16:28 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2017-08-18 18:15 ` Andrew Morton
2017-08-19 0:02 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-18 17:25 ` Mike Kravetz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-11 19:19 [PATCH v3 0/2] mm,fork,security: " riel
2017-08-11 19:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm,fork: " riel
2017-08-11 19:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-08-11 20:27 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-11 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-08-06 14:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm,fork,security: " riel
2017-08-06 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm,fork: " riel
2017-08-10 15:23 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:23 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-11 16:36 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-08-11 16:59 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-11 17:07 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-08-04 19:07 [PATCH 0/2] mm,fork,security: " riel
2017-08-04 19:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm,fork: " riel
2017-08-04 23:09 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-08-05 14:05 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-14 15:45 ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-04 19:01 [PATCH 0/2] mm,fork: MADV_WIPEONFORK - an empty VMA in the child riel
2017-08-04 19:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm,fork: introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK riel
2017-08-05 18:46 ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-05 19:33 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1503073709.6577.68.camel@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=colm@allcosts.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).