linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yang Shi" <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com>
To: mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: "Yang Shi" <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: use in_atomic() in print_vma_addr()
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 05:38:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1509572313-102989-1-git-send-email-yang.s@alibaba-inc.com> (raw)

commit 3e51f3c4004c9b01f66da03214a3e206f5ed627b
("sched/preempt: Remove PREEMPT_ACTIVE unmasking off in_atomic()") makes
in_atomic() just check the preempt count, so it is not necessary to use
preempt_count() in print_vma_addr() any more. Replace preempt_count() to
in_atomic() which is a generic API for checking atomic context.

Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index a728bed..19b684e 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4460,7 +4460,7 @@ void print_vma_addr(char *prefix, unsigned long ip)
 	 * Do not print if we are in atomic
 	 * contexts (in exception stacks, etc.):
 	 */
-	if (preempt_count())
+	if (in_atomic())
 		return;
 
 	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
-- 
1.8.3.1

             reply	other threads:[~2017-11-01 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-01 21:38 Yang Shi [this message]
2017-11-02  7:57 ` [PATCH] mm: use in_atomic() in print_vma_addr() Michal Hocko
2017-11-02 17:44   ` Yang Shi
2017-11-03  8:29     ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-03 18:02     ` Andrew Morton
2017-11-03 18:16       ` Yang Shi
2017-11-03 20:09       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-05  8:19         ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-06 10:05           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-06 10:43             ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-06 10:56               ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-06 12:00               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-06 12:12                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-06 13:40                   ` [PATCH] mm: do not rely on preempt_count in print_vma_addr (was: Re: [PATCH] mm: use in_atomic() in print_vma_addr()) Michal Hocko
2017-11-06 14:19                     ` [PATCH] mm: do not rely on preempt_count in print_vma_addr Vlastimil Babka
2017-11-06 14:28                       ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-06 16:16                     ` Yang Shi
2017-11-06 16:24                       ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1509572313-102989-1-git-send-email-yang.s@alibaba-inc.com \
    --to=yang.s@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).