From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S934406AbdKBUZO (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:25:14 -0400
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:50520 "EHLO mga09.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S932241AbdKBUZM (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:25:12 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,335,1505804400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="1032802723"
Message-ID: <1509654305.2547.212.camel@loki>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: fix Kconfig dependencies
From: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Harsha Priya N <harshapriya.n@intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Naveen M <naveen.m@intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 20:25:05 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20171102163228.GH3187@localhost>
References: <20171102110737.2813128-1-arnd@arndb.de>
         <48ffc83d-6ab0-3388-fade-9e02dc4459cf@linux.intel.com>
         <CAK8P3a3p4k=iU9Ym_h-Ahq5y93ga2yhDLO6S_6+g7dLN5aGbQQ@mail.gmail.com>
         <CAK8P3a3DhaUvQiyggVopT=DnRV2octdx8Qh8EeYmHd6fKaYHkg@mail.gmail.com>
         <20171102160406.GG3187@localhost>
         <CAK8P3a2jXrL2-eEZ0h_ay6CR45quzVjiqD5dWxubz29rVpxFYA@mail.gmail.com>
         <20171102163228.GH3187@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 22:02 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > The BYT legacy drivers used DMAengine (dw) to load the firmware
> and hence the
> > > dependency. The Skylake and other drivers do not need that, so we
> should
> > > move this from toplevel to the BYT driver only.
> > 
> > Ok, so Haswell also shouldn't select SND_SOC_INTEL_SST_FIRMWARE,
> right?
> 
> I am not sure on that. Liam?

Haswell and Broadwell also use the DW DMAC for FW loading like the BYT
legacy driver.

Liam