[PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] workqueue: Eliminate cond_resched_rcu_qs() in favor of cond_resched()

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] workqueue: Eliminate cond_resched_rcu_qs() in favor of cond_resched()
Date: Fri,  1 Dec 2017 11:21:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1512156104-20104-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171201192122.GA19301@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Now that cond_resched() also provides RCU quiescent states when
needed, it can be used in place of cond_resched_rcu_qs().  This
commit therefore makes this change.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 8fdb710bfdd7..aee7eaab05cb 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2135,7 +2135,7 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
 	 * stop_machine. At the same time, report a quiescent RCU state so
 	 * the same condition doesn't freeze RCU.
 	 */
-	cond_resched_rcu_qs();
+	cond_resched();
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
-- 
2.5.2
