From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752379AbdLGX2B (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 18:28:01 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:53319 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750993AbdLGX2A (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 18:28:00 -0500 X-ME-Sender: From: "Tobin C. Harding" To: Joe Perches Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andy Whitcroft Subject: [PATCH 0/4] checkpatch: update warnings Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:27:47 +1100 Message-Id: <1512689271-28051-1-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This set is a combination of previous submissions [PATCH v2 0/3] checkpatch: warn for use of %px [PATCH] checkpatch: add check for tag Co-Developed-by Although seemingly unrelated, they both patch checkpatch.pl and they were both contributed to by Joe and myself. They are also tied together by (previously incorrect) usage of the new Co-Developed-by tag. Retains Joe's Ack'ed by tag on the %px patch from v2. Retains Greg's Reviewed-by tag for the Co-Developed-by patch. The code is totally different but the sentiment is the same, in this case, I believe this is what the review was implying. The Joe Perches patch is from LKML with minor adjustments after testing. Needs review please. As discussed, if this is all ok it will go through Tobin's tree. thanks, Tobin. Joe Perches (1): checkpatch: add check for tag Co-Developed-by Tobin C. Harding (3): checkpatch: add sub routine get_stat_real() checkpatch: add sub routine get_stat_here() checkpatch: warn for use of %px scripts/checkpatch.pl | 172 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4