From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>,
matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: efi: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in efi_query_variable_store
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:49:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516848563.8378.60.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516847386-5291-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 10:29 +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> The function kzalloc here is not called in atomic context.
> If nonblocking in efi_query_variable_store is true,
> namely it is in atomic context, efi_query_variable_store will return before
> this kzalloc is called.
> Thus GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary, and it can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL.
>
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
[]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
[]
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ efi_status_t efi_query_variable_store(u32 attributes, unsigned long size,
> * that by attempting to use more space than is available.
> */
> unsigned long dummy_size = remaining_size + 1024;
> - void *dummy = kzalloc(dummy_size, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + void *dummy = kzalloc(dummy_size, GFP_KERNEL);
trivially, kzalloc takes a size_t not an unsigned long
and this _could_, though probably doesn't, lose precision.
It might be nicer to convert to size_t where appropriate.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-25 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-25 2:29 [PATCH] x86: efi: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in efi_query_variable_store Jia-Ju Bai
2018-01-25 2:49 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2018-02-13 18:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-13 18:40 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1516848563.8378.60.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).