From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Rick Hohensee <humbubba@smarty.smart.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("")
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 16:54:07 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15174.20383.84051.790269@pizda.ninka.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200107061724.NAA14777@smarty.smart.net>
In-Reply-To: <200107061724.NAA14777@smarty.smart.net>
Rick Hohensee writes:
> Forth chips aren't modern in the true-multi-user sense, but if an
> individual were to design such a beast they could get several of them,
> hundreds maybe, on FPGAs available now. Such things are coming, because a
> Forth chip IS something an individual can design.
And I suppose this zero-cost call is also handling things like keeping
an N stage deep pipeline full during this call right?
Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-06 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-06 17:24 Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("") Rick Hohensee
2001-07-06 23:54 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2001-07-07 0:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-07-07 0:37 ` David S. Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-23 4:39 Rick Hohensee
2001-07-09 3:03 Rick Hohensee
[not found] <mailman.994629840.17424.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2001-07-09 0:08 ` Pete Zaitcev
2001-07-09 0:28 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-07-07 6:16 Rick Hohensee
2001-07-05 3:26 Rick Hohensee
2001-07-04 10:10 Rick Hohensee
2001-07-04 3:37 Rick Hohensee
2001-07-04 3:36 ` Olivier Galibert
2001-07-04 6:24 ` Cort Dougan
2001-07-04 8:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-07-04 17:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-06 8:38 ` Cort Dougan
2001-07-06 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-06 20:02 ` Cort Dougan
2001-07-08 21:55 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-07-08 22:28 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-09 1:22 ` Johan Kullstam
2001-07-08 22:29 ` David S. Miller
2001-07-06 11:43 ` David S. Miller
2001-07-21 22:10 ` Richard Henderson
2001-07-22 3:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-22 3:59 ` Mike Castle
2001-07-22 6:49 ` Richard Henderson
2001-07-22 7:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-22 15:53 ` Richard Henderson
2001-07-22 19:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-04 7:15 ` pazke
2001-07-05 1:02 ` Michael Meissner
2001-07-05 1:54 ` Rick Hohensee
2001-07-05 16:54 ` Michael Meissner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15174.20383.84051.790269@pizda.ninka.net \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=humbubba@smarty.smart.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).