linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
	James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lustre <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [PATCH 14/19] staging: lustre: improve waiting in sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:47:59 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151847927912.19840.9343278155250610050.stgit@noble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151847037709.22826.16175867257667686132.stgit@noble>

Replace l_wait_event with wait_event_idle_timeout() and call the
handler function explicitly.  This makes it more clear
what is happening.

Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Farrell <paf@cray.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
index 617e004d00f8..90e3b3022106 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
@@ -554,9 +554,8 @@ int ctx_check_refresh(struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx)
 }
 
 static
-int ctx_refresh_timeout(void *data)
+int ctx_refresh_timeout(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
 {
-	struct ptlrpc_request *req = data;
 	int rc;
 
 	/* conn_cnt is needed in expire_one_request */
@@ -575,10 +574,8 @@ int ctx_refresh_timeout(void *data)
 }
 
 static
-void ctx_refresh_interrupt(void *data)
+void ctx_refresh_interrupt(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
 {
-	struct ptlrpc_request *req = data;
-
 	spin_lock(&req->rq_lock);
 	req->rq_intr = 1;
 	spin_unlock(&req->rq_lock);
@@ -611,7 +608,6 @@ int sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx(struct ptlrpc_request *req, long timeout)
 {
 	struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx = req->rq_cli_ctx;
 	struct ptlrpc_sec *sec;
-	struct l_wait_info lwi;
 	int rc;
 
 	LASSERT(ctx);
@@ -743,10 +739,28 @@ int sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx(struct ptlrpc_request *req, long timeout)
 	req->rq_restart = 0;
 	spin_unlock(&req->rq_lock);
 
-	lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(msecs_to_jiffies(timeout * MSEC_PER_SEC),
-			       ctx_refresh_timeout, ctx_refresh_interrupt,
-			       req);
-	rc = l_wait_event(req->rq_reply_waitq, ctx_check_refresh(ctx), &lwi);
+	rc = wait_event_idle_timeout(req->rq_reply_waitq,
+				     ctx_check_refresh(ctx),
+				     timeout * HZ);
+	if (rc == 0 && ctx_refresh_timeout(req) == 0) {
+		/* Keep waiting, but enable some signals */
+		rc = l_wait_event_abortable(req->rq_reply_waitq,
+					    ctx_check_refresh(ctx));
+		if (rc == 0)
+			rc = 1;
+	}
+
+	if (rc > 0)
+		/* condition is true */
+		rc = 0;
+	else if (rc == 0)
+		/* Timed out */
+		rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
+	else {
+		/* Aborted by signal */
+		rc = -EINTR;
+		ctx_refresh_interrupt(req);
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * following cases could lead us here:

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-12 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-12 21:22 [PATCH 00/19] RESEND staging: lustre: use standard wait_event macros NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 05/19] staging: lustre: use wait_event_idle_timeout() where appropriate NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 04/19] staging: lustre: discard cfs_time_seconds() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 08/19] staging: lustre: simplify waiting in ldlm_completion_ast() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 22:08   ` [lustre-devel] " Patrick Farrell
2018-02-13  0:17     ` NeilBrown
2018-02-13  0:46       ` Patrick Farrell
2018-02-13 20:17   ` [PATCH 08/19 - v2] " NeilBrown
2018-02-16 14:18     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 06/19] staging: lustre: introduce and use l_wait_event_abortable() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:36   ` [lustre-devel] " Patrick Farrell
2018-02-12 23:58     ` NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 03/19] staging: lustre: replace simple cases of l_wait_event() with wait_event() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 02/19] staging: lustre: discard SVC_SIGNAL and related functions NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 07/19] staging: lustre: simplify l_wait_event when intr handler but no timeout NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 01/19] sched/wait: add wait_event_idle() functions NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 13/19] staging: lustre: use wait_event_idle_timeout in ptlrpcd() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 10/19] staging: lustre: simplify waiting in ptlrpc_invalidate_import() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 19/19] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event() and related code NeilBrown
2018-02-13 18:15   ` [lustre-devel] " Patrick Farrell
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 09/19] staging: lustre: open code polling loop instead of using l_wait_event() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 16/19] staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_unregister_reply NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 17/19] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event from ptlrpc_set_wait NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 18/19] staging: lustre: replace l_wait_event_exclusive_head() with wait_event_idle_exclusive NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 12/19] staging: lustre: make polling loop in ptlrpc_unregister_bulk more obvious NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 11/19] staging: lustre: remove back_to_sleep() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 15/19] staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_service_unlink_rqbd NeilBrown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-08  3:28 [PATCH 5 v2: 00/19] staging: lustre: use standard wait_event macros NeilBrown
2018-01-08  3:28 ` [PATCH 14/19] staging: lustre: improve waiting in sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:34   ` James Simmons

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151847927912.19840.9343278155250610050.stgit@noble \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    --cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).