linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/20] rcu: Use wrapper for lockdep asserts
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:53:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519681990-31349-14-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180226215219.GA27379@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>

Commits c0b334c5bfa9 and ea9b0c8a26a2 introduced new sparse warnings
by accessing rcu_node->lock directly and ignoring the __private
marker.  Introduce a new wrapper and use it.  Also fix a similar problem
in srcutree.c introduced by a3883df3935e.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcu.h         |  5 ++++-
 kernel/rcu/srcutree.c    |  2 +-
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h |  4 ++--
 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
index c90812673d54..5d13f651cf08 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ do {									\
 } while (0)
 
 #define raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(p, flags)			\
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(p, lock), flags)	\
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(p, lock), flags)
 
 #define raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(p)					\
 ({									\
@@ -348,6 +348,9 @@ do {									\
 	___locked;							\
 })
 
+#define raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(p)				\
+	lockdep_assert_held(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(p, lock))
+
 #endif /* #if defined(SRCU) || !defined(TINY_RCU) */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index d5cea81378cc..9c6e0eaab4d5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static void srcu_gp_start(struct srcu_struct *sp)
 	struct srcu_data *sdp = this_cpu_ptr(sp->sda);
 	int state;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&sp->lock);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(sp, lock));
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(ULONG_CMP_GE(sp->srcu_gp_seq, sp->srcu_gp_seq_needed));
 	rcu_segcblist_advance(&sdp->srcu_cblist,
 			      rcu_seq_current(&sp->srcu_gp_seq));
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 4d7c727020f0..99d404c6bbbb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ static int rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(void)
  */
 static void rcu_gpnum_ovf(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 	if (ULONG_CMP_LT(READ_ONCE(rdp->gpnum) + ULONG_MAX / 4, rnp->gpnum))
 		WRITE_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap, true);
 	if (ULONG_CMP_LT(rdp->rcu_iw_gpnum + ULONG_MAX / 4, rnp->gpnum))
@@ -1629,7 +1629,7 @@ void rcu_cpu_stall_reset(void)
 static unsigned long rcu_cbs_completed(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 				       struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 
 	/*
 	 * If RCU is idle, we just wait for the next grace period.
@@ -1676,7 +1676,7 @@ rcu_start_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
 	bool ret = false;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rdp->rsp);
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 
 	/*
 	 * Pick up grace-period number for new callbacks.  If this
@@ -1804,7 +1804,7 @@ static bool rcu_accelerate_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
 {
 	bool ret = false;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 
 	/* If no pending (not yet ready to invoke) callbacks, nothing to do. */
 	if (!rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist))
@@ -1844,7 +1844,7 @@ static bool rcu_accelerate_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
 static bool rcu_advance_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
 			    struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 
 	/* If no pending (not yet ready to invoke) callbacks, nothing to do. */
 	if (!rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist))
@@ -1872,7 +1872,7 @@ static bool __note_gp_changes(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
 	bool ret;
 	bool need_gp;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 
 	/* Handle the ends of any preceding grace periods first. */
 	if (rdp->completed == rnp->completed &&
@@ -2297,7 +2297,7 @@ static bool
 rcu_start_gp_advanced(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
 		      struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 	if (!rsp->gp_kthread || !cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp)) {
 		/*
 		 * Either we have not yet spawned the grace-period
@@ -2359,7 +2359,7 @@ static bool rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 static void rcu_report_qs_rsp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
 	__releases(rcu_get_root(rsp)->lock)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rcu_get_root(rsp)->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rcu_get_root(rsp));
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp));
 	WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags, READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) | RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rcu_get_root(rsp), flags);
@@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@ rcu_report_qs_rnp(unsigned long mask, struct rcu_state *rsp,
 	unsigned long oldmask = 0;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp_c;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 
 	/* Walk up the rcu_node hierarchy. */
 	for (;;) {
@@ -2448,7 +2448,7 @@ static void rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 	unsigned long mask;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp_p;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 	if (rcu_state_p == &rcu_sched_state || rsp != rcu_state_p ||
 	    rnp->qsmask != 0 || rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)) {
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
@@ -2593,7 +2593,7 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp_leaf)
 	long mask;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp = rnp_leaf;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) ||
 	    rnp->qsmaskinit || rcu_preempt_has_tasks(rnp))
 		return;
@@ -3596,7 +3596,7 @@ static void rcu_init_new_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp_leaf)
 	long mask;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp = rnp_leaf;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 	for (;;) {
 		mask = rnp->grpmask;
 		rnp = rnp->parent;
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 1c2d58a85511..84fbee4686d3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_ctxt_queue(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 			 (rnp->expmask & rdp->grpmask ? RCU_EXP_BLKD : 0);
 	struct task_struct *t = current;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->mynode != rnp);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->level != rcu_num_lvls - 1);
 
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ static void rcu_initiate_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *t;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 	if (!rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp) && rnp->exp_tasks == NULL) {
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 		return;
-- 
2.5.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-26 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-26 21:52 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/20] Miscellaneous fixes Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/20] rcu: Remove unnecessary spinlock in rcu_boot_init_percpu_data() Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/20] sched/isolation: Eliminate NO_HZ_FULL_ALL Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/20] rcu: Fix CPU offload boot message when no CPUs are offloaded Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/20] doc: Fix typo in rcutorture documentation Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/20] doc: Fix typo in rcu_head comments Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/20] rcu: Call touch_nmi_watchdog() while printing stall warnings Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/20] rcu: Remove obsolete boost statistics for debugfs Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/20] rcu: Remove obsolete callback-invocation " Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/20] rcu: Remove obsolete __rcu_pending() " Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/20] rcu: Remove obsolete force-quiescent-state " Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/20] rcu: More clearly identify grace-period kthread stack dump Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/20] rcu: Consolidate rcu.h #ifdefs Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/20] rcu: Remove redundant nxttail index macro define Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:53 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-02-26 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/20] rcu: Fix init_rcu_head() comment Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/20] rcu: Fix misprint in srcu_funnel_exp_start Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/20] rcu: Add more tracing of expedited grace periods Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/20] rcu: Trace expedited GP delays due to transitioning CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/20] rcu: Make expedited RCU CPU selection avoid unnecessary stores Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/20] rcu: Create RCU-specific workqueues with rescuers Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1519681990-31349-14-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).