From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752162AbeBZVyl (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:54:41 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:43068 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751823AbeBZVww (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:52:52 -0500 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/20] rcu: Fix init_rcu_head() comment. Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:53:05 -0800 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.5.2 In-Reply-To: <20180226215219.GA27379@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20180226215219.GA27379@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18022621-0048-0000-0000-0000023FB3DA X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00008601; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000254; SDB=6.00995530; UDB=6.00506033; IPR=6.00774858; MB=3.00019751; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-02-26 21:52:49 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18022621-0049-0000-0000-00004443360E Message-Id: <1519681990-31349-15-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-02-26_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1802260274 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The current (and implicit) comment header for init_rcu_head() and destroy_rcu_head() incorrectly says that they are not needed for statically allocated rcu_head structures. This commit therefore fixes this comment. Reported-by: Bart Van Assche Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky --- include/linux/rcupdate.h | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h index 043d04784675..36360d07f25b 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h @@ -214,10 +214,12 @@ do { \ #endif /* - * init_rcu_head_on_stack()/destroy_rcu_head_on_stack() are needed for dynamic - * initialization and destruction of rcu_head on the stack. rcu_head structures - * allocated dynamically in the heap or defined statically don't need any - * initialization. + * The init_rcu_head_on_stack() and destroy_rcu_head_on_stack() calls + * are needed for dynamic initialization and destruction of rcu_head + * on the stack, and init_rcu_head()/destroy_rcu_head() are needed for + * dynamic initialization and destruction of statically allocated rcu_head + * structures. However, rcu_head structures allocated dynamically in the + * heap don't need any initialization. */ #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD void init_rcu_head(struct rcu_head *head); -- 2.5.2