From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934961AbeCHNSi (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2018 08:18:38 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:5725 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752041AbeCHNSg (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2018 08:18:36 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,441,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="23527420" Message-ID: <1520515113.20980.31.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Ming Lei , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Laurence Oberman Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 15:18:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20180308105358.1506-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> References: <20180308105358.1506-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.5 (3.26.5-1.fc27) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 18:53 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > Hi, > > This patchset tries to spread among online CPUs as far as possible, so > that we can avoid to allocate too less irq vectors with online CPUs > mapped. > > For example, in a 8cores system, 4 cpu cores(4~7) are offline/non present, > on a device with 4 queues: > > 1) before this patchset > irq 39, cpu list 0-2 > irq 40, cpu list 3-4,6 > irq 41, cpu list 5 > irq 42, cpu list 7 > > 2) after this patchset > irq 39, cpu list 0,4 > irq 40, cpu list 1,6 > irq 41, cpu list 2,5 > irq 42, cpu list 3,7 > > Without this patchset, only two vectors(39, 40) can be active, but there > can be 4 active irq vectors after applying this patchset. Tested-by: Artem Bityutskiy Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519311270.2535.53.camel@intel.com Ming, this patchset fixes the v4.16-rcX regression that I reported few weeks ago. I applied it and verified that Dell R640 server that I mentioned in the bug report boots up and the disk works. So this is not just an improvement, it also includes a bugfix. Thanks!