linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Yang Bo <yangbo@deepin.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH -tip 5/9] x86: kprobes: Ignore break_handler
Date: Fri,  9 Mar 2018 21:37:47 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152059906701.4214.6794382165554467552.stgit@devbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152059891712.4214.9539716544254881611.stgit@devbox>

Remove break_handler related code since that was used
only for jprobe and jprobe is removed now.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h |   10 ----------
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c   |   13 ++-----------
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c |   16 ++--------------
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h
index ae38dccf0c8f..2b949f4fd4d8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h
@@ -105,14 +105,4 @@ static inline unsigned long __recover_optprobed_insn(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, unsig
 }
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
-extern int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
-			   struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb);
-#else
-static inline int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
-				  struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index f5b09b0850ad..7663f23aa860 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -686,10 +686,8 @@ int kprobe_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 			/*
 			 * If we have no pre-handler or it returned 0, we
 			 * continue with normal processing.  If we have a
-			 * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, it prepped
-			 * for calling the break_handler below on re-entry
-			 * for jprobe processing, so get out doing nothing
-			 * more here.
+			 * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, it modified
+			 * regs->ip so no singlestep is needed.
 			 */
 			if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs))
 				setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
@@ -708,13 +706,6 @@ int kprobe_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		regs->ip = (unsigned long)addr;
 		preempt_enable_no_resched();
 		return 1;
-	} else if (kprobe_running()) {
-		p = __this_cpu_read(current_kprobe);
-		if (p->break_handler && p->break_handler(p, regs)) {
-			if (!skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb))
-				setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
-			return 1;
-		}
 	} /* else: not a kprobe fault; let the kernel handle it */
 
 	preempt_enable_no_resched();
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c
index 8dc0161cec8f..c8696f2a583f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 #include "common.h"
 
 static nokprobe_inline
-void __skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
+void skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
 		      struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long orig_ip)
 {
 	/*
@@ -43,18 +43,6 @@ void __skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
 		regs->ip = orig_ip;
 }
 
-int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
-		    struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
-{
-	if (kprobe_ftrace(p)) {
-		__skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
-		preempt_enable_no_resched();
-		return 1;
-	}
-	return 0;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(skip_singlestep);
-
 /* Ftrace callback handler for kprobes -- called under preepmt disabed */
 void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
 			   struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -80,7 +68,7 @@ void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
 		__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, p);
 		kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
 		if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs)) {
-			__skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, orig_ip);
+			skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, orig_ip);
 			preempt_enable_no_resched();
 		}
 		/*

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-09 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-09 12:35 [RFC PATCH -tip 0/9] kprobes: Cleanup jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:35 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 1/9] kprobes: Remove jprobe API implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:36 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 2/9] x86: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:36 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 3/9] kprobes: Remove jprobe data structure and interfaces Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 4/9] kprobes: Ignore break_handler Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2018-03-09 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 6/9] kprobes: Remove break_handler from struct kprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 7/9] x86: kprobes: Do not disable preempt on int3 path Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:39 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 8/9] error-injection: Fix to not enabling preemption in pre_handler Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-10  8:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-11 15:05     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:39 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 9/9] tracing: kprobes: Fix to not enabling preemption Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 23:54 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 0/9] kprobes: Cleanup jprobe implementation Steven Rostedt
2018-03-10 13:55   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-10  8:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-11 15:13   ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=152059906701.4214.6794382165554467552.stgit@devbox \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangbo@deepin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).