From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752464AbeCOR3q (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:29:46 -0400
Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:38894 "EHLO
        bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751557AbeCOR3n (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:29:43 -0400
Message-ID: <1521134981.5348.62.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: Fix IMA Kconfig for dependencies on ARM64
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)" <david.safford@ge.com>,
        Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: "dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com" <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
        "jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
        "serge@hallyn.com" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
        <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:29:41 -0700
In-Reply-To: <1521134074.3547.629.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <1520400386-17674-1-git-send-email-anjiandi@codeaurora.org>
         <20180307185132.GA30102@ziepe.ca>
         <1520448953.10396.565.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <1520449719.5558.28.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
         <1520450495.10396.587.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <1520451662.24314.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
         <1520461156.10396.654.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <191cfd49-0c66-a5ef-3d2b-b6c4132aa294@codeaurora.org>
         <1520615461.12216.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
         <1520891598.3547.190.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <1520893847.4522.62.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
         <1520897400.3547.253.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <1520899605.4522.67.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
         <BCA04D5D9A3B764C9B7405BBA4D4A3C002367FEF@ALPMBAPA12.e2k.ad.ge.com>
         <1521038471.4508.25.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
         <1521047286.3547.470.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <1521048306.4508.56.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
         <1521130749.3547.608.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <1521133728.5348.51.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
         <1521134074.3547.629.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 13:14 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 10:08 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 12:19 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > If EFI is extending the TPM, will the events be added to the TPM
> > > event log or to the IMA measurement list?
> > 
> > I'm not proposing any changes to the tpm_pcr_extend API.  At the
> > moment it does an extend without logging, so that's what it will do
> > in the EFI driver case as well.  That means logging is still the
> > responsibility of the caller.
> 
> Does EFI support extending multiple TPM banks?

The specs are here:

https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/tcg-efi-protocol-specification/

As I said, I'm not planning to change the tpm_pcr_.. API.  At the
moment for a TPM2 we extend all banks in the tpm_pcr_extend() API, so
that's what we'll continue to do ... including extending the sha256
banks with the sha1 hash, which seems to be our current practice.

James