From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752238AbeCPSTl (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:19:41 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:53019 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750806AbeCPSTj (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:19:39 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,317,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="212277278" Message-ID: <1521224375.23017.41.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vsprintf: Prevent crash when dereferencing invalid pointers From: Andy Shevchenko To: Petr Mladek Cc: Linus Torvalds , Rasmus Villemoes , "Tobin C . Harding" , Joe Perches , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Sergey Senozhatsky Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 20:19:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20180315152607.xgzjmj5as6lg42dy@pathway.suse.cz> References: <1520330185.10722.401.camel@linux.intel.com> <20180307155244.b45c3fb5vcxb4q2l@pathway.suse.cz> <20180308141824.bfk2pr6wmjh4ytdi@pathway.suse.cz> <20180309150153.3sxbbpd6jdn2d5yy@pathway.suse.cz> <20180314140947.rs3b6i5gguzzu5wi@pathway.suse.cz> <1521119343.10722.665.camel@linux.intel.com> <20180315152607.xgzjmj5as6lg42dy@pathway.suse.cz> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.5-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 16:26 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Thu 2018-03-15 15:09:03, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 15:09 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > > We already prevent crash when dereferencing some obviously broken > > > pointers. But the handling is not consistent. Sometimes we print > > > "(null)" > > > only for pure NULL pointer, sometimes for pointers in the first > > > page and > > > > > > > sometimes also for pointers in the last page (error codes). > > > > I still think that printing a hex value of the error code is much > > better > > than some odd "(efault)". > > Do you mean (err:0e)? Google gives rather confusing answers for this. More like "(0xHHHH)" (we have already more than 512 error code numbers. > I am not super excited about (efault). But it seems to be less > cryptic and the style is more similar to (null). > > Best Regards, > Petr -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy