From: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
To: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
Philip Derrin <philip@cog.systems>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@intel.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>,
YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
Daniel Vacek <neelx@redhat.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/5] optimize memblock_next_valid_pfn and early_pfn_valid on arm and arm64
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2018 19:30:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1522636236-12625-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com> (raw)
Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns
where possible") tried to optimize the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But
there is still some room for improvement.
Patch 1 remain the memblock_next_valid_pfn on arm and arm64
Patch 2 optimizes the memblock_next_valid_pfn()
Patch 3~5 optimizes the early_pfn_valid()
I tested the pfn loop process in memmap_init(), the same as before.
As for the performance improvement, after this set, I can see the time
overhead of memmap_init() is reduced from 41313 us to 24345 us in my
armv8a server(QDF2400 with 96G memory).
Attached the memblock region information in my server.
[ 86.956758] Zone ranges:
[ 86.959452] DMA [mem 0x0000000000200000-0x00000000ffffffff]
[ 86.966041] Normal [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x00000017ffffffff]
[ 86.972631] Movable zone start for each node
[ 86.977179] Early memory node ranges
[ 86.980985] node 0: [mem 0x0000000000200000-0x000000000021ffff]
[ 86.987666] node 0: [mem 0x0000000000820000-0x000000000307ffff]
[ 86.994348] node 0: [mem 0x0000000003080000-0x000000000308ffff]
[ 87.001029] node 0: [mem 0x0000000003090000-0x00000000031fffff]
[ 87.007710] node 0: [mem 0x0000000003200000-0x00000000033fffff]
[ 87.014392] node 0: [mem 0x0000000003410000-0x000000000563ffff]
[ 87.021073] node 0: [mem 0x0000000005640000-0x000000000567ffff]
[ 87.027754] node 0: [mem 0x0000000005680000-0x00000000056dffff]
[ 87.034435] node 0: [mem 0x00000000056e0000-0x00000000086fffff]
[ 87.041117] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008700000-0x000000000871ffff]
[ 87.047798] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008720000-0x000000000894ffff]
[ 87.054479] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008950000-0x0000000008baffff]
[ 87.061161] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008bb0000-0x0000000008bcffff]
[ 87.067842] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008bd0000-0x0000000008c4ffff]
[ 87.074524] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008c50000-0x0000000008e2ffff]
[ 87.081205] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008e30000-0x0000000008e4ffff]
[ 87.087886] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008e50000-0x0000000008fcffff]
[ 87.094568] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008fd0000-0x000000000910ffff]
[ 87.101249] node 0: [mem 0x0000000009110000-0x00000000092effff]
[ 87.107930] node 0: [mem 0x00000000092f0000-0x000000000930ffff]
[ 87.114612] node 0: [mem 0x0000000009310000-0x000000000963ffff]
[ 87.121293] node 0: [mem 0x0000000009640000-0x000000000e61ffff]
[ 87.127975] node 0: [mem 0x000000000e620000-0x000000000e64ffff]
[ 87.134657] node 0: [mem 0x000000000e650000-0x000000000fffffff]
[ 87.141338] node 0: [mem 0x0000000010800000-0x0000000017feffff]
[ 87.148019] node 0: [mem 0x000000001c000000-0x000000001c00ffff]
[ 87.154701] node 0: [mem 0x000000001c010000-0x000000001c7fffff]
[ 87.161383] node 0: [mem 0x000000001c810000-0x000000007efbffff]
[ 87.168064] node 0: [mem 0x000000007efc0000-0x000000007efdffff]
[ 87.174746] node 0: [mem 0x000000007efe0000-0x000000007efeffff]
[ 87.181427] node 0: [mem 0x000000007eff0000-0x000000007effffff]
[ 87.188108] node 0: [mem 0x000000007f000000-0x00000017ffffffff]
[ 87.194791] Initmem setup node 0 [mem 0x0000000000200000-0x00000017ffffffff]
Without this patchset:
[ 117.106153] Initmem setup node 0 [mem 0x0000000000200000-0x00000017ffffffff]
[ 117.113677] before memmap_init
[ 117.118195] after memmap_init
>>> memmap_init takes 4518 us
[ 117.121446] before memmap_init
[ 117.154992] after memmap_init
>>> memmap_init takes 33546 us
[ 117.158241] before memmap_init
[ 117.161490] after memmap_init
>>> memmap_init takes 3249 us
>>> totally takes 41313 us
With this patchset:
[ 87.194791] Initmem setup node 0 [mem 0x0000000000200000-0x00000017ffffffff]
[ 87.202314] before memmap_init
[ 87.206164] after memmap_init
>>> memmap_init takes 3850 us
[ 87.209416] before memmap_init
[ 87.226662] after memmap_init
>>> memmap_init takes 17246 us
[ 87.229911] before memmap_init
[ 87.233160] after memmap_init
>>> memmap_init takes 3249 us
>>> totally takes 24345 us
Changelog:
V5: - further refining as suggested by Danial Vacek. Make codes
arm/arm64 more arch specific
V4: - refine patches as suggested by Danial Vacek and Wei Yang
- optimized on arm besides arm64
V3: - fix 2 issues reported by kbuild test robot
V2: - rebase to mmotm latest
- remain memblock_next_valid_pfn on arm64
- refine memblock_search_pfn_regions and pfn_valid_region
Jia He (5):
mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn() on arm and arm64
arm: arm64: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in
memblock_next_valid_pfn()
mm/memblock: introduce memblock_search_pfn_regions()
arm64: introduce pfn_valid_region()
mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in early_pfn_valid()
arch/arm/include/asm/page.h | 6 +++-
arch/arm/mm/init.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h | 6 +++-
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/linux/memblock.h | 2 ++
include/linux/mmzone.h | 8 ++++-
mm/memblock.c | 9 ++++++
mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++-
8 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-02 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-02 2:30 Jia He [this message]
2018-04-02 2:30 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn() on arm and arm64 Jia He
2018-04-02 6:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-04-02 7:49 ` Jia He
2018-04-02 7:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-04-03 3:07 ` Jia He
2018-04-11 4:47 ` Jia He
2018-04-02 7:50 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-02 2:30 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] arm: arm64: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn() Jia He
2018-04-02 6:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-04-02 8:43 ` Daniel Vacek
2018-04-02 8:01 ` Daniel Vacek
2018-04-02 15:07 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-02 2:30 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] mm/memblock: introduce memblock_search_pfn_regions() Jia He
2018-04-02 6:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-04-02 2:30 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: introduce pfn_valid_region() Jia He
2018-04-02 6:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-04-02 18:53 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-02 2:30 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in early_pfn_valid() Jia He
2018-04-02 7:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-04-02 8:15 ` Jia He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1522636236-12625-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com \
--to=hejianet@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=erosca@de.adit-jv.com \
--cc=gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@linaro.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kemi.wang@intel.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=neelx@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=philip@cog.systems \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).