From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 04:28:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 04:28:09 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:56204 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 04:27:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <15269.45902.377383.360402@charged.uio.no> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:24:46 +0200 To: Chmouel Boudjnah Cc: Horst von Brand , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.9-ac11 In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <200109170049.f8H0nkEa008317@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl> X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no From: Trond Myklebust User-Agent: SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) CLIME/1.13.6 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2YbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJU4+MRsoQg==?=) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386-redhat-linux) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Chmouel Boudjnah writes: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=100019824200351&w=2 BTW: This is *not* the patch that went into Linus' tree. The above version has a bug in the replacement for locks_delete_lock() that was fixed in the final patch (which was posted on L-K later that same day). AFAICS, ac11 contains the same patch that is in Linus' tree. It is correct. Cheers, Trond