From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
"Akhil P Oommen" <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org, jcrouse@codeaurora.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, smasetty@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dma-buf/fence: Take refcount on the module that owns the fence
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 11:08:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152966212844.11773.6596589902326100250@mail.alporthouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1529661856.7034.404.camel@padovan.org>
Quoting Gustavo Padovan (2018-06-22 11:04:16)
> Hi Akhil,
>
> On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 15:10 +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> > Each fence object holds function pointers of the module that
> > initialized
> > it. Allowing the module to unload before this fence's release is
> > catastrophic. So, keep a refcount on the module until the fence is
> > released.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - added description for the new function parameter.
> >
> > drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> > include/linux/dma-fence.h | 10 ++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-
> > fence.c
> > index 4edb9fd..2aaa44e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > * more details.
> > */
> >
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/export.h>
> > #include <linux/atomic.h>
> > @@ -168,6 +169,7 @@ void dma_fence_release(struct kref *kref)
> > {
> > struct dma_fence *fence =
> > container_of(kref, struct dma_fence, refcount);
> > + struct module *module = fence->owner;
> >
> > trace_dma_fence_destroy(fence);
> >
> > @@ -178,6 +180,8 @@ void dma_fence_release(struct kref *kref)
> > fence->ops->release(fence);
> > else
> > dma_fence_free(fence);
> > +
> > + module_put(module);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_release);
> >
> > @@ -541,6 +545,7 @@ struct default_wait_cb {
> >
> > /**
> > * dma_fence_init - Initialize a custom fence.
> > + * @module: [in] the module that calls this API
> > * @fence: [in] the fence to initialize
> > * @ops: [in] the dma_fence_ops for operations on this
> > fence
> > * @lock: [in] the irqsafe spinlock to use for locking
> > this fence
> > @@ -556,8 +561,9 @@ struct default_wait_cb {
> > * to check which fence is later by simply using dma_fence_later.
> > */
> > void
> > -dma_fence_init(struct dma_fence *fence, const struct dma_fence_ops
> > *ops,
> > - spinlock_t *lock, u64 context, unsigned seqno)
> > +_dma_fence_init(struct module *module, struct dma_fence *fence,
> > + const struct dma_fence_ops *ops, spinlock_t *lock,
> > + u64 context, unsigned seqno)
> > {
> > BUG_ON(!lock);
> > BUG_ON(!ops || !ops->wait || !ops->enable_signaling ||
> > @@ -571,7 +577,11 @@ struct default_wait_cb {
> > fence->seqno = seqno;
> > fence->flags = 0UL;
> > fence->error = 0;
> > + fence->owner = module;
> > +
> > + if (!try_module_get(module))
> > + fence->owner = NULL;
> >
> > trace_dma_fence_init(fence);
> > }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_init);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(_dma_fence_init);
>
> Do we still need to export the symbol, it won't be called from outside
> anymore? Other than that looks good to me:
There's a big drawback in that a module reference is often insufficient,
and that a reference on the driver (or whatever is required for the
lifetime of the fence) will already hold the module reference.
Considering that we want a few 100k fences in flight per second, is
there no other way to only export a fence with a module reference?
-Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-22 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-22 9:40 [PATCH v2] dma-buf/fence: Take refcount on the module that owns the fence Akhil P Oommen
2018-06-22 10:04 ` Gustavo Padovan
2018-06-22 10:08 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2018-06-22 11:42 ` Akhil P Oommen
2018-06-25 7:50 ` Daniel Vetter
[not found] ` <82f8e976-2a5a-56df-28bb-c75314824bf6@codeaurora.org>
2018-06-26 8:17 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152966212844.11773.6596589902326100250@mail.alporthouse.com \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=akhilpo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=jcrouse@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smasetty@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).