LKML Archive on
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <>
To: Thomas Gleixner <>
Cc: LKML <>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>,
	Anna-Maria Gleixner <>
Subject: [PATCH v2] nohz: Fix missing tick reprog while interrupting inline timer softirq
Date: Fri,  3 Aug 2018 15:31:34 +0200
Message-ID: <> (raw)

The full nohz tick is reprogrammed on IRQ exit only if we are not in
a nesting interrupt. This stands as an optimization: whether we are
interrupting a hardirq or a softirq, the tick is going to be
reprogrammed eventually in the end of the inner IRQ, with even potential
new updates on the timer queue.

Now when we are interrupting softirqs, we always assume that they are
executing on IRQ-tail. Indeed in that case tick_nohz_irq_exit() is
called after softirq processing to take care of the tick reprogramming.
But the assumption is wrong: softirqs can be processed inline as well,
ie: outside of an IRQ, like in a call to local_bh_enable() or from

Inline softirqs don't reprogram the tick once they are done, as opposed
to IRQ-tail softirq processing. So if a tick interrupts an inline
softirq processing, the next timer will neither be reprogrammed from
the interrupting tick's irq_exit() nor after the interrupted softirq
processing. This situation may leave us later in userspace with the tick
unprogrammed while we can have timers in the queue.

To fix this, simply keep reprogramming the tick if we are in a hardirq
interrupting softirq. We can still figure out a way later to restore
this optimization while excluding inline softirq processing.

Note that new timers enqueued in nohz_full mode after a softirq gets
interrupted will still be handled just fine through self-IPIs triggered
by the timer code.

Reported-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <>
Tested-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <>
 kernel/softirq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 900dcfe..0980a81 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static inline void tick_irq_exit(void)
 	/* Make sure that timer wheel updates are propagated */
 	if ((idle_cpu(cpu) && !need_resched()) || tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu)) {
-		if (!in_interrupt())
+		if (!in_irq())

             reply index

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-03 13:31 Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2018-08-03 13:54 ` [tip:timers/urgent] nohz: Fix missing tick reprogram when interrupting an inline softirq tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

LKML Archive on

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/1.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/2.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/3.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/4.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/5.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/6.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/7.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/8.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/9.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ \
	public-inbox-index lkml

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone