linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jia He <jia.he@hxt-semitech.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: no need to call spin_lock_irqsave/restore when irq is disabled
Date: Fri,  3 Aug 2018 21:57:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1533304624-43250-2-git-send-email-jia.he@hxt-semitech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1533304624-43250-1-git-send-email-jia.he@hxt-semitech.com>

Because kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate currently is definitly in the context
which irq is disabled (local_irq_disable/enable). There is no need to
call spin_lock_irqsave/restore in vgic_fold_lr_state and vgic_prune_ap_list

This patch replace them with the spin_lock/unlock no irq version

Signed-off-by: Jia He <jia.he@hxt-semitech.com>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c |  7 ++++---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c |  7 ++++---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c    | 13 +++++++------
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
index a5f2e44..487f5f2 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
 	struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpuif = &vgic_cpu->vgic_v2;
 	int lr;
-	unsigned long flags;
+
+	DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
 
 	cpuif->vgic_hcr &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE;
 
@@ -83,7 +84,7 @@ void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 		irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid);
 
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+		spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
 
 		/* Always preserve the active bit */
 		irq->active = !!(val & GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT);
@@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 				vgic_irq_set_phys_active(irq, false);
 		}
 
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+		spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
 		vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
 	}
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
index cdce653..b66b513 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *cpuif = &vgic_cpu->vgic_v3;
 	u32 model = vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model;
 	int lr;
-	unsigned long flags;
+
+	DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
 
 	cpuif->vgic_hcr &= ~ICH_HCR_UIE;
 
@@ -75,7 +76,7 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		if (!irq)	/* An LPI could have been unmapped. */
 			continue;
 
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+		spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
 
 		/* Always preserve the active bit */
 		irq->active = !!(val & ICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT);
@@ -118,7 +119,7 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 				vgic_irq_set_phys_active(irq, false);
 		}
 
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+		spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
 		vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
 	}
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
index c22cea6..7cfdfbc 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -593,10 +593,11 @@ static void vgic_prune_ap_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
 	struct vgic_irq *irq, *tmp;
-	unsigned long flags;
+
+	DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
 
 retry:
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(irq, tmp, &vgic_cpu->ap_list_head, ap_list) {
 		struct kvm_vcpu *target_vcpu, *vcpuA, *vcpuB;
@@ -637,7 +638,7 @@ static void vgic_prune_ap_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		/* This interrupt looks like it has to be migrated. */
 
 		spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock, flags);
+		spin_unlock(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock);
 
 		/*
 		 * Ensure locking order by always locking the smallest
@@ -651,7 +652,7 @@ static void vgic_prune_ap_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			vcpuB = vcpu;
 		}
 
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&vcpuA->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock, flags);
+		spin_lock(&vcpuA->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock);
 		spin_lock_nested(&vcpuB->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock,
 				 SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 		spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
@@ -676,7 +677,7 @@ static void vgic_prune_ap_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 		spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
 		spin_unlock(&vcpuB->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vcpuA->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock, flags);
+		spin_unlock(&vcpuA->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock);
 
 		if (target_vcpu_needs_kick) {
 			kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_IRQ_PENDING, target_vcpu);
@@ -686,7 +687,7 @@ static void vgic_prune_ap_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		goto retry;
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock);
 }
 
 static inline void vgic_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-- 
1.8.3.1


  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-03 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-03 13:57 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: move DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON to vgic.h Jia He
2018-08-03 13:57 ` Jia He [this message]
2018-08-06 14:13   ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: no need to call spin_lock_irqsave/restore when irq is disabled Christoffer Dall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1533304624-43250-2-git-send-email-jia.he@hxt-semitech.com \
    --to=hejianet@gmail.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jia.he@hxt-semitech.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).