From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754379Ab3BEKHE (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 05:07:04 -0500 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:44021 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754286Ab3BEKHA (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 05:07:00 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Nathan Zimmer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Guo , linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: cpufreq_driver_lock is hot on large systems Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 11:13:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1535355.NvOsIhbBYp@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.8.0-rc6; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1360017913-25667-1-git-send-email-nzimmer@sgi.com> <3480441.gCEh0J5edK@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 03:28:30 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I actually don't agree with that, becuase the Nathan's apprach shows the > > reasoning that leads to the RCU introduction quite clearly. So if you > > don't have technical problems with the patchset, I'm going to take it as is. > > Great!! > > Okay.. I don't have any technical problems with it, i reviewed most of it > carefully. The only pending thing is rebase on linux-next, after that i can > give my ack for it. Yes, it would be great if it were rebased and retested. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.