linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Daniel Axtens" <dja@axtens.net>,
	"Dmitry Safonov" <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
	"Sergey Senozhatsky" <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
	"Tan Xiaojun" <tanxiaojun@huawei.com>,
	"Peter Hurley" <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
	"Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Michael Neuling" <mikey@neuling.org>,
	"Mikulas Patocka" <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tty: Drop tty->count on tty_reopen() failure
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 17:13:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1535559207.23560.55.camel@arista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cbedde00-a0f4-6714-f7f4-a180dca15ce0@suse.cz>

On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 16:38 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 08/29/2018, 04:23 AM, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> > In case of tty_ldisc_reinit() failure, tty->count should be
> > decremented
> > back, otherwise we will never release_tty().
> > Never seen it in the real life, but it seems not really hard to
> > hit.
> 
> I did see it. And this fixes it.

Thanks, I'll add your tested-by, if I'll have to resend.

> 
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 11 ++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> > index 32bc3e3fe4d3..5e5da9acaf0a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> > @@ -1255,6 +1255,7 @@ static void tty_driver_remove_tty(struct
> > tty_driver *driver, struct tty_struct *
> >  static int tty_reopen(struct tty_struct *tty)
> >  {
> >  	struct tty_driver *driver = tty->driver;
> > +	int retval;
> >  
> >  	if (driver->type == TTY_DRIVER_TYPE_PTY &&
> >  	    driver->subtype == PTY_TYPE_MASTER)
> > @@ -1268,10 +1269,14 @@ static int tty_reopen(struct tty_struct
> > *tty)
> >  
> >  	tty->count++;
> >  
> > -	if (!tty->ldisc)
> > -		return tty_ldisc_reinit(tty, tty->termios.c_line);
> > +	if (tty->ldisc)
> > +		return 0;
> >  
> > -	return 0;
> > +	retval = tty_ldisc_reinit(tty, tty->termios.c_line);
> > +	if (retval)
> > +		tty->count--;
> 
> I would just do:
>   if (!retval)
>     tty->count++;
> here. Nobody from ldiscs should rely on tty->count.

I thought about that and probably should have described in commit
message why I haven't done that: I prefer to keep it as was as I did Cc
stable tree - to keep the chance of regression to minimum.

I agree that your way is cleaner, but probably it may be done as
cleanup on top for linux-next..

-- 
Thanks,
             Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-29 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-29  2:23 [PATCH 0/4] tty: Hold write ldisc sem in tty_reopen() Dmitry Safonov
2018-08-29  2:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] tty: Drop tty->count on tty_reopen() failure Dmitry Safonov
2018-08-29 14:38   ` Jiri Slaby
2018-08-29 16:13     ` Dmitry Safonov [this message]
2018-08-31  6:47       ` Jiri Slaby
2018-08-31 11:54         ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-08-29  2:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] tty: Hold tty_ldisc_lock() during tty_reopen() Dmitry Safonov
2018-08-29  4:34   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-08-29 14:30     ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-08-30  5:16     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-29 14:40   ` Jiri Slaby
2018-08-29 14:45     ` Jiri Slaby
2018-08-29 16:36     ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-08-29 15:19   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-08-31  6:51     ` Jiri Slaby
2018-08-31 11:17       ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-08-31 11:21         ` Jiri Slaby
2018-08-31 12:12           ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-07  4:50   ` [LKP] [tty] 0b4f83d510: INFO:task_blocked_for_more_than#seconds kernel test robot
2018-09-07  6:39     ` Jiri Slaby
2018-09-07 11:12       ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-10  5:14       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-10 18:50         ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-08-29  2:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] tty: Lock tty pair in tty_init_dev() Dmitry Safonov
2018-08-29 14:46   ` Jiri Slaby
2018-08-29 16:28     ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-08-31  6:54       ` Jiri Slaby
2018-08-31 12:22         ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-08-29  2:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] tty/lockdep: Add ldisc_sem asserts Dmitry Safonov
2018-08-30  7:03 ` [PATCH 0/4] tty: Hold write ldisc sem in tty_reopen() Pasi Kärkkäinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1535559207.23560.55.camel@arista.com \
    --to=dima@arista.com \
    --cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasik@iki.fi \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tanxiaojun@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).