linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] code of conduct fixes
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:07:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1539202053.12644.8.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)

Resend to show accumulated tags and also to add a third patch listing
the TAB as the reporting point as a few people seem to want.  If it
gets the same level of support, I'll send it in with the other two.

---

Previous cover letter:


We've had several threads discussing potential changes to the code of
conduct but Mauro is the only person to have proposed an actual patch. 
In order to move the debate on, I'm presenting two patches, one to fix
the email problem Mauro identified and the other to strip the
enforcement section pending community discussion as Shuah suggested.

I'll take responsibility for collecting any tags people want to add
(review/ack/sign off, etc) and sending the patch in as a signed pull
request before 4.19 final if they get enough community support.

Note, I've sent both patches in as a series to facilitate review and
discussion, but they are separable if one is looked on with less favour
than the other.

It was also a bit unclear which list to send this to, but I finally
settled on linux-kernel as the catch all and ksummit-discuss since
that's where most of the current discussion is.  I can add other lists
as people suggest them.

James

---

James Bottomley (3):
  code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses
  code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community
    discussion
  code-of-conduct: Add back the TAB as the central reporting point

 Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 13 ++++---------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

-- 
2.13.7


             reply	other threads:[~2018-10-10 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-10 20:07 James Bottomley [this message]
2018-10-10 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses James Bottomley
2018-10-10 22:17   ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-11  2:33   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-15 20:58   ` Kees Cook
2018-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community discussion James Bottomley
2018-10-10 21:04   ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Luck, Tony
2018-10-10 21:19     ` James Bottomley
2018-10-10 21:28       ` Luck, Tony
2018-10-15 21:02     ` Kees Cook
2018-10-11  2:37   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] code-of-conduct: Add back the TAB as the central reporting point James Bottomley
2018-10-10 20:13   ` Alan Cox
2018-10-11  2:30     ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-11  6:50     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-10 21:04   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-10 23:23 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 0/3] code of conduct fixes Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-10 23:41   ` Al Viro
2018-10-11  0:00   ` James Bottomley
2018-10-11  3:11     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-11 10:43   ` Rainer Fiebig
2018-10-11  6:39 ` Tomi Valkeinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1539202053.12644.8.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).