From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: add 74aup1g157gw 2-input multiplexer as clock driver
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 09:06:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <153936040246.5275.14492857755273657122@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87woqoaty1.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Quoting Kuninori Morimoto (2018-10-11 17:37:30)
> > > + .recalc_rate = clk74_recalc_rate,
> > > + .get_parent = clk74_get_parent,
> > > +};
> >
> > Can this all be handled by the 'gpio-mux-clock' compatible/driver? I
> > suppose it may need an update to add the rounding policy that you want
> > via some sort of DT property, but otherwise it would be fine?
>
> Hmm.. not sure.
> If we can add new feature (= .round_rate ?) on gpio-mux-clock,
> I can consider it.
Yes that would be the idea. Extend gpio-mux-clock driver to have what
you want with rounding. I'm not really sure why there is a rounding
policy needed though. Is it a static configuration at boot, or does the
code using this gpio clk need to search the parent rate space somehow
and mux it over?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-12 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-10 2:15 [PATCH 0/2] add 74aup1g157gw 2-input multiplexer as clock driver Kuninori Morimoto
2018-10-10 2:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: add description of 74aup1g157gw Kuninori Morimoto
2018-10-17 16:05 ` Rob Herring
2018-10-18 0:15 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2018-10-10 2:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: add 74aup1g157gw 2-input multiplexer as clock driver Kuninori Morimoto
2018-10-11 6:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-10-12 0:37 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2018-10-12 16:06 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2018-10-14 23:53 ` Kuninori Morimoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=153936040246.5275.14492857755273657122@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).