linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>
To: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>
Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH] intel_th: Fix a missing-check bug
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 08:46:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1539956812-11300-1-git-send-email-wang6495@umn.edu> (raw)

In msc_data_sz(), the 'valid_dw' field of the msc block descriptor 'bdesc'
is firstly checked to see whether the descriptor has a valid data width. If
yes, i.e., 'bdesc->valid_dw' is not 0, the data size of this descriptor
will be returned. It is worth noting that the data size is calculated from
'bdesc->valid_dw'. The problem here is that 'bdesc' actually points to a
consistent DMA region, which is allocated through dma_alloc_coherent() in
msc_buffer_win_alloc(). Given that the device also has the permission to
access this DMA region, it is possible that a malicious device controlled
by an attacker can modify the 'valid_dw' field after the if statement but
before the return statement in msc_data_sz(). Through this way, the device
can bypass the check and supply unexpected data width.

This patch copies the 'valid_dw' field to a local variable and then
performs the check and the calculation on the local variable to avoid the
above issue.

Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>
---
 drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/msu.h | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/msu.h b/drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/msu.h
index 9cc8ace..b7d846e 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/msu.h
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/msu.h
@@ -79,10 +79,12 @@ struct msc_block_desc {
 
 static inline unsigned long msc_data_sz(struct msc_block_desc *bdesc)
 {
-	if (!bdesc->valid_dw)
+	u32 valid_dw = bdesc->valid_dw;
+
+	if (!valid_dw)
 		return 0;
 
-	return bdesc->valid_dw * 4 - MSC_BDESC;
+	return valid_dw * 4 - MSC_BDESC;
 }
 
 static inline bool msc_block_wrapped(struct msc_block_desc *bdesc)
-- 
2.7.4


             reply	other threads:[~2018-10-19 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-19 13:46 Wenwen Wang [this message]
2018-10-29 18:39 ` [PATCH] intel_th: Fix a missing-check bug Wenwen Wang
2018-10-30 11:15   ` Alexander Shishkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1539956812-11300-1-git-send-email-wang6495@umn.edu \
    --to=wang6495@umn.edu \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).