linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
To: <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <avanbrunt@nvidia.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <vdumpa@nvidia.com>,
	<Snikam@nvidia.com>, Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3] arm64: Don't flush tlb while clearing the accessed bit
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:55:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1540805158-618-1-git-send-email-amhetre@nvidia.com> (raw)

From: Alex Van Brunt <avanbrunt@nvidia.com>

Accessed bit is used to age a page and in generic implementation there is
flush_tlb while clearing the accessed bit.
Flushing a TLB is overhead on ARM64 as access flag faults don't get
translation table entries cached into TLB's. Flushing TLB is not necessary
for this. Clearing the accessed bit without flushing TLB doesn't cause data
corruption on ARM64.
In our case with this patch, speed of reading from fast NVMe/SSD through
PCIe got improved by 10% ~ 15% and writing got improved by 20% ~ 40%.
So for performance optimisation don't flush TLB when clearing the accessed
bit on ARM64.
x86 made the same optimization even though their TLB invalidate is much
faster as it doesn't broadcast to other CPUs.
Please refer to:
'commit b13b1d2d8692 ("x86/mm: In the PTE swapout page reclaim case clear
the accessed bit instead of flushing the TLB")'

Signed-off-by: Alex Van Brunt <avanbrunt@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 2ab2031..080d842 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -652,6 +652,26 @@ static inline int ptep_test_and_clear_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	return __ptep_test_and_clear_young(ptep);
 }
 
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR_YOUNG_FLUSH
+static inline int ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+					 unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep)
+{
+	/*
+	 * On ARM64 CPUs, clearing the accessed bit without a TLB flush
+	 * doesn't cause data corruption. [ It could cause incorrect
+	 * page aging and the (mistaken) reclaim of hot pages, but the
+	 * chance of that should be relatively low. ]
+	 *
+	 * So as a performance optimization don't flush the TLB when
+	 * clearing the accessed bit, it will eventually be flushed by
+	 * a context switch or a VM operation anyway. [ In the rare
+	 * event of it not getting flushed for a long time the delay
+	 * shouldn't really matter because there's no real memory
+	 * pressure for swapout to react to. ]
+	 */
+	return ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, address, ptep);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
 #define __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_TEST_AND_CLEAR_YOUNG
 static inline int pmdp_test_and_clear_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
-- 
2.7.4


             reply	other threads:[~2018-10-29  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-29  9:25 Ashish Mhetre [this message]
2018-10-29  9:57 ` [PATCH V3] arm64: Don't flush tlb while clearing the accessed bit Jon Hunter
2018-10-29 10:55 ` Will Deacon
2018-10-29 15:13   ` Alexander Van Brunt
2018-12-03 21:20     ` Alexander Van Brunt
2018-12-06 19:18       ` Will Deacon
     [not found]         ` <BYAPR12MB271239AAF4A0B79D756850C6CFA90@BYAPR12MB2712.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
2018-12-06 20:42           ` Alexander Van Brunt
2018-12-07 17:53             ` Will Deacon
2018-12-08  0:05               ` Alexander Van Brunt
     [not found]   ` <4bac3ba7-a005-213d-5ae4-c0e2ee589d5d@nvidia.com>
2018-10-30 11:50     ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1540805158-618-1-git-send-email-amhetre@nvidia.com \
    --to=amhetre@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Snikam@nvidia.com \
    --cc=avanbrunt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).