linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
To: <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>,
	<benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>, <s-anna@ti.com>,
	Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] remoteproc: fix rproc_alloc_carveout() for rproc with iommu domain
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 22:29:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1543526968-56091-6-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1543526968-56091-1-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com>

Correct remoteproc core behavior when memory carveout device
address is fixed in resource table and rproc device doesn't have
associated IOMMU.
Current returned error is breaking legacy on TI platforms.
This patch restores previous behavior. It adds a warn message when
allocation doesn't fit carveout request, but doesn't stop rproc_start()
sequence anymore.

Fixes: 3bc8140b157c ("remoteproc: configure IOMMU only if device address requested")

Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 61c954bd695e..f19bc6961e40 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -719,6 +719,18 @@ static int rproc_alloc_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
 	dev_dbg(dev, "carveout va %pK, dma %pad, len 0x%x\n",
 		va, &dma, mem->len);
 
+	if (mem->da != FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY && !rproc->domain) {
+		/*
+		 * Check requested da is equal to dma address
+		 * and print a warn message in case of missalignment.
+		 * Don't stop rproc_start sequence as coprocessor may
+		 * build pa to da translation on its side.
+		 */
+		if (mem->da != (u32)dma)
+			dev_warn(dev->parent,
+				 "Allocated carveout doesn't fit device address request\n");
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Ok, this is non-standard.
 	 *
@@ -736,15 +748,7 @@ static int rproc_alloc_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
 	 * to use the iommu-based DMA API: we expect 'dma' to contain the
 	 * physical address in this case.
 	 */
-
-	if (mem->da != FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY) {
-		if (!rproc->domain) {
-			dev_err(dev->parent,
-				"Bad carveout rsc configuration\n");
-			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			goto dma_free;
-		}
-
+	if (mem->da != FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY && rproc->domain) {
 		mapping = kzalloc(sizeof(*mapping), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!mapping) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -771,7 +775,9 @@ static int rproc_alloc_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
 
 		dev_dbg(dev, "carveout mapped 0x%x to %pad\n",
 			mem->da, &dma);
-	} else {
+	}
+
+	if (mem->da == FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY) {
 		/* Update device address as undefined by requester */
 		if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) > sizeof(u32))
 			dev_warn(dev, "DMA address cast in 32bit to fit resource table format\n");
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-29 21:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-29 21:29 [PATCH 0/7] remoteproc: Fixes for memoy carveout management Loic Pallardy
2018-11-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 1/7] remoteproc: correct rproc_mem_entry_init() comments Loic Pallardy
2018-11-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] remoteproc: fix rproc_da_to_va in case of unallocated carveout Loic Pallardy
2018-11-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 3/7] remoteproc: fix rproc_alloc_carveout() bad variable cast Loic Pallardy
2018-11-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 4/7] remoteproc: add warning on resource table cast Loic Pallardy
2018-11-30 14:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-30 20:48     ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-11-29 21:29 ` Loic Pallardy [this message]
2018-11-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] remoteproc: fix trace buffer va initialization Loic Pallardy
2018-12-06 20:37   ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-11-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] remoteproc: fix rproc_check_carveout_da() returned error and comments Loic Pallardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1543526968-56091-6-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com \
    --to=loic.pallardy@st.com \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=s-anna@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).