linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Phil Edworthy" <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] clk: Add (devm_)clk_get_optional() functions
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 01:09:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <154356894146.88331.4169293505438588293@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181120141445.21378-1-phil.edworthy@renesas.com>

Quoting Phil Edworthy (2018-11-20 06:14:45)
> This adds clk_get_optional() and devm_clk_get_optional() functions to get
> optional clocks.
> They behave the same as (devm_)clk_get except where there is no clock
> producer. In this case, instead of returning -ENOENT, the function
> returns NULL. This makes error checking simpler and allows
> clk_prepare_enable, etc to be called on the returned reference
> without additional checks.

Ok. I guess that works by virtue of how -ENOENT is returned by various
functions that are called deeper in the clk_get() path? I'm cautiously
optimistic. So cautious, we should probably add a comment to these
optional functions that indicate they rely on the functions they call to
return -ENOENT under the various conditions that make a clk optional.

> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk.h b/include/linux/clk.h
> index a7773b5c0b9f..3ea3c78f62dd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk.h
> @@ -383,6 +383,17 @@ int __must_check devm_clk_bulk_get_all(struct device *dev,
>   */
>  struct clk *devm_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id);
>  
> +/**
> + * devm_clk_get_optional - lookup and obtain a managed reference to an optional
> + *                        clock producer.
> + * @dev: device for clock "consumer"
> + * @id: clock consumer ID
> + *
> + * Behaves the same as devm_clk_get except where there is no clock producer. In

Please add () around devm_clk_get() so we know it's a function.

> + * this case, instead of returning -ENOENT, the function returns NULL.
> + */
> +struct clk *devm_clk_get_optional(struct device *dev, const char *id);
> +
>  /**
>   * devm_get_clk_from_child - lookup and obtain a managed reference to a
>   *                          clock producer from child node.
> @@ -718,6 +729,12 @@ static inline struct clk *devm_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
>         return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static inline struct clk *devm_clk_get_optional(struct device *dev,
> +                                               const char *id)
> +{
> +       return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int __must_check devm_clk_bulk_get(struct device *dev, int num_clks,
>                                                  struct clk_bulk_data *clks)
>  {
> @@ -862,6 +879,16 @@ static inline void clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(int num_clks,
>         clk_bulk_unprepare(num_clks, clks);
>  }
>  
> +static inline struct clk *clk_get_optional(struct device *dev, const char *id)

Any kernel doc for this function?

> +{
> +       struct clk *clk = clk_get(dev, id);
> +
> +       if (clk == ERR_PTR(-ENOENT))
> +               clk = NULL;
> +
> +       return clk;
> +}
> +

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-30  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-20 14:14 [PATCH v8] clk: Add (devm_)clk_get_optional() functions Phil Edworthy
2018-11-30  9:09 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2018-11-30 10:25   ` Phil Edworthy
2018-11-30 11:04     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-30 18:55       ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=154356894146.88331.4169293505438588293@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=phil.edworthy@renesas.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).