From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: mcgrof@kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, tj@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, rafael@kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com,
pavel@ucw.cz, zwisler@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
dave.jiang@intel.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com
Subject: [driver-core PATCH v8 7/9] driver core: Attach devices on CPU local to device node
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 09:25:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <154403074977.11544.13408447599624293705.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154403054034.11544.3978949383914046587.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com>
Call the asynchronous probe routines on a CPU local to the device node. By
doing this we should be able to improve our initialization time
significantly as we can avoid having to access the device from a remote
node which may introduce higher latency.
For example, in the case of initializing memory for NVDIMM this can have a
significant impact as initialing 3TB on remote node can take up to 39
seconds while initialing it on a local node only takes 23 seconds. It is
situations like this where we will see the biggest improvement.
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/base/dd.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
index b731741059cb..49096adf96a1 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ static int __device_attach(struct device *dev, bool allow_async)
*/
dev_dbg(dev, "scheduling asynchronous probe\n");
get_device(dev);
- async_schedule(__device_attach_async_helper, dev);
+ async_schedule_dev(__device_attach_async_helper, dev);
} else {
pm_request_idle(dev);
}
@@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ static int __driver_attach(struct device *dev, void *data)
if (!dev->driver) {
get_device(dev);
dev->p->async_driver = drv;
- async_schedule(__driver_attach_async_helper, dev);
+ async_schedule_dev(__driver_attach_async_helper, dev);
}
device_unlock(dev);
return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-05 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-05 17:25 [driver-core PATCH v8 0/9] Add NUMA aware async_schedule calls Alexander Duyck
2018-12-05 17:25 ` [driver-core PATCH v8 1/9] driver core: Move async_synchronize_full call Alexander Duyck
2018-12-05 17:25 ` [driver-core PATCH v8 2/9] driver core: Establish order of operations for device_add and device_del via bitflag Alexander Duyck
2018-12-10 18:58 ` Dan Williams
2018-12-10 19:35 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-12-10 19:43 ` Dan Williams
2018-12-10 20:57 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-12-10 21:15 ` Dan Williams
2018-12-10 21:23 ` Dan Williams
2018-12-10 22:24 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-12-10 22:41 ` Dan Williams
2018-12-05 17:25 ` [driver-core PATCH v8 3/9] device core: Consolidate locking and unlocking of parent and device Alexander Duyck
2018-12-05 17:25 ` [driver-core PATCH v8 4/9] driver core: Probe devices asynchronously instead of the driver Alexander Duyck
2018-12-05 17:25 ` [driver-core PATCH v8 5/9] workqueue: Provide queue_work_node to queue work near a given NUMA node Alexander Duyck
2018-12-05 17:25 ` [driver-core PATCH v8 6/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific " Alexander Duyck
2018-12-05 17:25 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2018-12-05 17:25 ` [driver-core PATCH v8 8/9] PM core: Use new async_schedule_dev command Alexander Duyck
2018-12-05 17:26 ` [driver-core PATCH v8 9/9] libnvdimm: Schedule device registration on node local to the device Alexander Duyck
2018-12-10 19:22 ` [driver-core PATCH v8 0/9] Add NUMA aware async_schedule calls Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-10 23:25 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-12-10 23:35 ` Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=154403074977.11544.13408447599624293705.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com \
--to=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).