From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7C5C04EB8 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03152084C for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:11:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544469100; bh=70ky5jNiENNjxK7v/TPaMDr6GZk2DOehXnQlMX8dGXw=; h=In-Reply-To:To:Subject:From:References:Cc:Date:List-ID:From; b=khjzACsmPYelkngce9ofF8RJ9UUmu6SPHAi7s37i13tvjWCb+JHS629gBd87UKW76 /OF9Rmm26RZbiqBSbdt/oWhzkGmyyUYzbFF/vXHvHiCMwMmallp4GgIcwtpt1n2KTt ub5ngg99FVdsVCVzrMXVKx98n+BzLv/GlQt1vsMQ= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B03152084C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728828AbeLJTLj (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:11:39 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38952 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727286AbeLJTLj (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:11:39 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 557552082F; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:11:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544469098; bh=70ky5jNiENNjxK7v/TPaMDr6GZk2DOehXnQlMX8dGXw=; h=In-Reply-To:To:Subject:From:References:Cc:Date:From; b=ZZHr7Hnk6h3goHXph1Q4TIZ36NBzFzsMPwyvwjIqORdO1QdLEPKaB9o+s9zFh4yY1 asCTFF05U9FsEJduS4835sbBzQ47YOd9w8Rwh34SCL2dxqWTFZKneg71Ac46ew6s0B mTu3LZSbhJYShBDU4foxpNGAs3kGWi+FcuM05S6w= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20180925214940.15188-1-decatf@gmail.com> Message-ID: <154446909759.17204.16576704793216207531@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> To: Peter De Schrijver , Robert Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] clk: tegra: Return the exact clock rate from clk_round_rate From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: alot/0.7 References: <20180925214940.15188-1-decatf@gmail.com> Cc: Prashant Gaikwad , Michael Turquette , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Yang Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:11:37 -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Robert Yang (2018-09-25 14:49:40) > The current behavior is that clk_round_rate would return the same clock > rate passed to it for valid PLL configurations. This change will return > the exact rate the PLL will provide in accordance with clk API. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Robert Yang > --- Applied to clk-next