From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02F5C04EB8 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DB82084E for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:44:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544474674; bh=bcUsIa4aih7i00yvzAZ8BvGLJfQl/k0/te3QHfkaajM=; h=In-Reply-To:To:Subject:From:References:Cc:Date:List-ID:From; b=zx7h8ionuumNnlwWIDbcaeShSQ/P77UCmVubbYLEoJC78aG42AY9EPg7Pvg2+4K7N /GnHGBbqmmyVYImi+H5s76EZ4GcFb400P4LgnmNIDdB66glQgJfFCce6B75fPImJ0g ds562WraVUkrCUpwTj4/YgIDqs05ffJekEcsrBd4= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 76DB82084E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729714AbeLJUod (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 15:44:33 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48154 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727351AbeLJUoc (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 15:44:32 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E689720821; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:44:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544474672; bh=bcUsIa4aih7i00yvzAZ8BvGLJfQl/k0/te3QHfkaajM=; h=In-Reply-To:To:Subject:From:References:Cc:Date:From; b=wHca8Nhea8MtGLE/7u8K/L5oaxrHKj22yRRJCe4N2QPSbDHsNRUErg/V1zxkI5kWP cHhPpjV+i/lih62ymjbFVpZXm4HaggqrgkbRh0dFAKoAd2ZU9WFOVCYKoZ2TDb5s1N j1s5w4MRIjGESF4khJOl5BASEA4BA5aUjYuJ2+3Y= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20181207100144.GA21411@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <154447467108.17204.9435382576631633133@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> To: matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com, mazziesaccount@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] clk: bd718x7: Initial support for ROHM bd71837/bd71847 PMIC clock From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: alot/0.7 References: <20181207100144.GA21411@localhost.localdomain> Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:44:31 -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2018-12-07 02:01:44) > ROHM bd71837 and bd71847 contain 32768Hz clock gate. Support the clock > using generic clock framework. Note, only bd71837 is tested but bd71847 > should be identical what comes to clk parts. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen > --- Applied to clk-next