From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] include/linux/nodemask.h: Use nr_node_ids instead of MAX_NUMNODES in nodemask_pr_args
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:30:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1545154231-22824-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
When viewing the /proc/<pid>/status file, one can see output lines like
Cpus_allowed: ffffffff,ffffffff,ffffffff
Cpus_allowed_list: 0-95
Mems_allowed: 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,0000000f
Mems_allowed_list: 0-3
It looks really strange that so many bits are displayed in the
"Mems_allowed:" line. Whereas the "Cpus_allowed:" line is perfectly
fine.
It is because the nodemask_pr_args() macro uses MAX_NUMNODES as the
number of nodes to iterate. The cpumask_pr_args() macro uses nr_cpu_ids
instead of MAX_CPUS. For nodes, there is a corresponding nr_node_ids.
So it makes sense to use nr_node_ids instead to be consistent with
"Cpus_allowed:".
With that change, the "Mems_allowed:" line becomes
Mems_allowed: f
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/nodemask.h | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/nodemask.h b/include/linux/nodemask.h
index 5a30ad5..ba07661 100644
--- a/include/linux/nodemask.h
+++ b/include/linux/nodemask.h
@@ -97,6 +97,8 @@
typedef struct { DECLARE_BITMAP(bits, MAX_NUMNODES); } nodemask_t;
extern nodemask_t _unused_nodemask_arg_;
+extern int nr_node_ids;
+extern int nr_online_nodes;
/**
* nodemask_pr_args - printf args to output a nodemask
@@ -108,7 +110,7 @@
__nodemask_pr_bits(maskp)
static inline unsigned int __nodemask_pr_numnodes(const nodemask_t *m)
{
- return m ? MAX_NUMNODES : 0;
+ return m ? nr_node_ids : 0;
}
static inline const unsigned long *__nodemask_pr_bits(const nodemask_t *m)
{
@@ -444,9 +446,6 @@ static inline int next_memory_node(int nid)
return next_node(nid, node_states[N_MEMORY]);
}
-extern int nr_node_ids;
-extern int nr_online_nodes;
-
static inline void node_set_online(int nid)
{
node_set_state(nid, N_ONLINE);
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-12-18 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-18 17:30 Waiman Long [this message]
2018-12-18 20:41 ` [PATCH] include/linux/nodemask.h: Use nr_node_ids instead of MAX_NUMNODES in nodemask_pr_args Andrew Morton
2018-12-18 21:41 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1545154231-22824-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).