From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86807C43387 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E68F21738 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="hXdR3RmE" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726761AbfAJA2W (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 19:28:22 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f195.google.com ([209.85.215.195]:38307 "EHLO mail-pg1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726590AbfAJA2V (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 19:28:21 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f195.google.com with SMTP id g189so4037701pgc.5 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:28:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:cc:to:in-reply-to :from:user-agent:references:message-id:date; bh=8eBGWXckAb/SIpb7ck6qGfkx7wOiPVDSozVWyaBmSlg=; b=hXdR3RmEevrr14XpABoUDwtEkVMf/CezZImacygYi+n5IwUDq/Zb/p1PbhaW43GVRn 6nZutfaLPiOuXyco9BQl7gE985yyDbDKz6PTX/oOPRk0oHXsj/rO7z+jztV7pG73yIJu g4fmzb2+QbRPV60ZeoBCGen3s/MsMjzCDRrsk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject :cc:to:in-reply-to:from:user-agent:references:message-id:date; bh=8eBGWXckAb/SIpb7ck6qGfkx7wOiPVDSozVWyaBmSlg=; b=OVLFWEY5UycP5Lsk29XubifwUslvtGTH1mWSAN4ypn0nkCVkGDJOhBuv3J6kKB559D 5ejbKuP3c5RPvSiw5ffCyg7ES3Er+/4UrB9HP+j8IMhKEjUO+4bt3ptsITHTUl3IjCrz BpsTBqx7u3DftufGO8MZrOOZju7RyrNCme/Ih4OaB1rxEVDmI3rEoSYycRgbp3WW7TBc yLCIjVWCuuRHiJ5KxMGbnAuCc0ambn+Bv5hCDotBQONBYj4/zUnLkPfwsi+bN6Hluj6x mQVD4F+zkYay7BzExkX0pymAh9sy5skTNuz779D8Gh1A+Jcqk4duhdCBRVxRpESaBNKk asGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeA0pjoSpP5dGVSEJHM9PHRdzHfNDrLuICBq0bXtpA9un4B2XqU pQUQxjaa2Rchc65699HFTZdULQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7zVfGKluboNNOvPv2WfOhP27kIopy4TTazy6qSiuuF6CchwF9VSlTRmdhxw4uHYZ5VOmNYXg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:b81a:: with SMTP id p26mr7471353pge.433.1547080100377; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:28:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2620:15c:202:1:fa53:7765:582b:82b9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f32sm89968438pgf.80.2019.01.09.16.28.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:28:19 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] arm64: dts: sdm845: wireup the thermal trip points to cpufreq Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, edubezval@gmail.com, andy.gross@linaro.org, tdas@codeaurora.org, dianders@chromium.org, mka@chromium.org, David Brown , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org To: Amit Kucheria , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <6c5b26e65be18222587724e066fc2e39b9f60397.1547078153.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org> From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: alot/0.8 References: <6c5b26e65be18222587724e066fc2e39b9f60397.1547078153.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org> Message-ID: <154708009884.15366.3039982038291126570@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:28:18 -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-01-09 16:00:56) > Since the big and little cpus are in the same frequency domain, use all Oh? I thought the big and little cpus were in different frequency domains and voltage domains. Maybe that's what you're saying here but I'm misunderstanding. So change the wording a bit to be more clear? > of them for mitigation in the cooling-map. At the lower trip points we > restrict ourselves to throttling only a few OPPs. At higher trip > temperatures, allow ourselves to be throttled to any extent. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria