From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF77AC282C2 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 01:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F05521916 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 01:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=wdc.com header.i=@wdc.com header.b="JTcx/Xfh" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727341AbfBHBwI (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 20:52:08 -0500 Received: from esa4.hgst.iphmx.com ([216.71.154.42]:13327 "EHLO esa4.hgst.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727199AbfBHBvh (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 20:51:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1549590697; x=1581126697; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references; bh=7egq28/CSCkrSFqdZR+3wqM8pX3AZ5gSH/KN6l36VFg=; b=JTcx/XfhYATP7VQeMY32syV9GlSffhdsQByLVR51gV6V64bF9rbUTnzr sl9IXHDJyPhoS0EJXMVvbYX80r4hCwko5BD1jeb6TdxEFiNuc6zqCNmE2 9dxW5YUMOxRcQ2DVz2vjQ+ufWNlOoE9nojW9B+b0SbFrn1jvJ1Vs5HAUJ yQiHhISA3T9dhYxB25oEOAhNSuQiNP4jXZPiOy5TNeiz/dL3THKct2Af5 Ax0ELcLJpjUt8L7hiUaTzdmvoATacMBH+iFmoyC8C62NUE6kN8buB9770 57koHu3oaYBCv8glxAqBMIC7KQGNPCJekmEYyb0w4sdKmN5Ue45s5W1kZ Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,346,1544457600"; d="scan'208";a="100752800" Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.15]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2019 09:51:36 +0800 Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com ([10.248.3.37]) by uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2019 17:32:19 -0800 Received: from jedi-01.sdcorp.global.sandisk.com (HELO jedi-01.int.fusionio.com) ([10.11.143.218]) by uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2019 17:51:36 -0800 From: Atish Patra To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: Atish Patra , Alan Kao , Albert Ou , Andreas Schwab , Anup Patel , Daniel Lezcano , Dmitriy Cherkasov , Jason Cooper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Palmer Dabbelt , =?UTF-8?q?Patrick=20St=C3=A4hlin?= , Paul Walmsley , Thomas Gleixner , Zong Li , Damien Le Moal Subject: [v3 PATCH 3/8] RISC-V: Remove NR_CPUs check during hartid search from DT Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 17:51:16 -0800 Message-Id: <1549590681-24125-4-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1549590681-24125-1-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> References: <1549590681-24125-1-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In non-smp configuration, hartid can be higher that NR_CPUS. riscv_of_processor_hartid should not be compared to hartid to NR_CPUS in that case. Moreover, this function checks all the DT properties of a hart node. NR_CPUS comparison seems out of place. Signed-off-by: Atish Patra Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Anup Patel --- arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c index f8fa2c63..19edaeae 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c @@ -34,10 +34,6 @@ int riscv_of_processor_hartid(struct device_node *node) pr_warn("Found CPU without hart ID\n"); return -(ENODEV); } - if (hart >= NR_CPUS) { - pr_info("Found hart ID %d, which is above NR_CPUs. Disabling this hart\n", hart); - return -(ENODEV); - } if (of_property_read_string(node, "status", &status)) { pr_warn("CPU with hartid=%d has no \"status\" property\n", hart); -- 2.7.4