On Mon, 2019-02-04 at 22:07 +0100, David Kozub wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 09:50:10PM +0100, David Kozub wrote: > > > From: Jonas Rabenstein > > > > > > All add_token_* functions have a common set of conditions that have to > > > be checked. Use a common function for those checks in order to avoid > > > different behaviour as well as code duplication. > > > > > > Co-authored-by: David Kozub > > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Rabenstein > > > Signed-off-by: David Kozub > > > Reviewed-by: Scott Bauer > > > --- > > > block/sed-opal.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++--------- > > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/block/sed-opal.c b/block/sed-opal.c > > > index 5c123a5b4ab1..980705681806 100644 > > > --- a/block/sed-opal.c > > > +++ b/block/sed-opal.c > > > @@ -510,15 +510,29 @@ static int opal_discovery0(struct opal_dev *dev, void *data) > > > return opal_discovery0_end(dev); > > > } > > > > > > -static void add_token_u8(int *err, struct opal_dev *cmd, u8 tok) > > > +static size_t remaining_size(struct opal_dev *cmd) > > > +{ > > > + return IO_BUFFER_LENGTH - cmd->pos; > > > +} > > > > This function seem a little pointless to me, at least as of this patch > > where it only has a single user just below. > > It is eventually used for the second time in 11/16 block: sed-opal: ioctl > for writing to shadow mbr. > > If you feel strongly about this I can exclude it from this commit and > introduce it in 11/16 (where it then will called from here and from > write_shadow_mbr). > > Best regards, > David I'd prefer this option where we refactor later Otherwise looks good Reviewed-by Jon Derrick