From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 0/3] blk-mq: refactor code of issue request directly
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:01:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <154edba0-f4dc-716f-df64-50b23db39138@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88fe68c6-886c-1328-009a-9c7c5fa4ebc9@kernel.dk>
On 12/5/18 10:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/14/18 8:12 PM, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>> Hi Jens
>>
>> Please consider this patchset for 4.21.
>> It refactors the code of issue request directly to unify the interface
>> and make the code clearer and more readable.
>>
>> The 1st patch refactors the code of issue request directly to unify the
>> helper interface which could handle all the cases.
>>
>> The 2nd patch make blk_mq_sched_insert_requests issue requests directly
>> with 'bypass' false, then it needn't to handle the non-issued requests
>> any more.
>>
>> The 3rd patch replace and kill the blk_mq_request_issue_directly.
>
> I'd love to get this queued up, the direct dispatch path is a mess and
> it's even now been known to cause corruptions... I'm going to queue
> up the direct dispatch fix shortly, and apply it to for-4.21/block
> as well. Any chance you can respin this on top after that?
>
OK, I will do now.
Thanks
Jianchao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-05 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-15 3:12 [PATCH V8 0/3] blk-mq: refactor code of issue request directly Jianchao Wang
2018-11-15 3:12 ` [PATCH V8 1/3] blk-mq: refactor the " Jianchao Wang
2018-11-15 3:12 ` [PATCH V8 2/3] blk-mq: issue directly with bypass 'false' in blk_mq_sched_insert_requests Jianchao Wang
2018-11-15 3:12 ` [PATCH V8 3/3] blk-mq: replace and kill blk_mq_request_issue_directly Jianchao Wang
2018-12-05 2:58 ` [PATCH V8 0/3] blk-mq: refactor code of issue request directly Jens Axboe
2018-12-05 3:01 ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2018-12-05 3:07 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=154edba0-f4dc-716f-df64-50b23db39138@oracle.com \
--to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).