From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ima: dynamically allocate shash_desc
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:07:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1560794826.4072.169.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1560786951.4072.103.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 11:55 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 13:20 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On 32-bit ARM, we get a warning about excessive stack usage when
> > building with clang.
> >
> > security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c:504:5: error: stack frame size
> > of 1152 bytes in function 'ima_calc_field_array_hash' [-Werror,-
> > Wframe-larger-than=]
>
> I'm definitely not seeing this. Is this problem a result of non
> upstreamed patches? For sha1, currently the only possible hash
> algorithm, I'm seeing 664.
Every time a measurement is added to the measurement list, the memory
would be allocated/freed. The frequency of new measurements is policy
dependent. For performance reasons, I'd prefer if the allocation
remains on the stack.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-17 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-17 11:20 [PATCH] ima: dynamically allocate shash_desc Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-17 15:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-06-17 18:07 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2019-06-17 20:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-18 12:44 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-06-18 18:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-18 18:53 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1560794826.4072.169.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).