From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: syzbot+7966f2a0b2c7da8939b4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
dhowells@redhat.com, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Fix send on a connected, but unbound socket
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 15:59:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <156207955265.1655.13658692984261290810.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
If sendmsg() or sendmmsg() is called on a connected socket that hasn't had
bind() called on it, then an oops will occur when the kernel tries to
connect the call because no local endpoint has been allocated.
Fix this by implicitly binding the socket if it is in the
RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND state, just like it does for the RXRPC_UNBOUND state.
Further, the state should be transitioned to RXRPC_CLIENT_BOUND after this
to prevent further attempts to bind it.
This can be tested with:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <linux/rxrpc.h>
static const unsigned char inet6_addr[16] = {
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1, 0xac, 0x14, 0x14, 0xaa
};
int main(void)
{
struct sockaddr_rxrpc srx;
struct cmsghdr *cm;
struct msghdr msg;
unsigned char control[16];
int fd;
memset(&srx, 0, sizeof(srx));
srx.srx_family = 0x21;
srx.srx_service = 0;
srx.transport_type = AF_INET;
srx.transport_len = 0x1c;
srx.transport.sin6.sin6_family = AF_INET6;
srx.transport.sin6.sin6_port = htons(0x4e22);
srx.transport.sin6.sin6_flowinfo = htons(0x4e22);
srx.transport.sin6.sin6_scope_id = htons(0xaa3b);
memcpy(&srx.transport.sin6.sin6_addr, inet6_addr, 16);
cm = (struct cmsghdr *)control;
cm->cmsg_len = CMSG_LEN(sizeof(unsigned long));
cm->cmsg_level = SOL_RXRPC;
cm->cmsg_type = RXRPC_USER_CALL_ID;
*(unsigned long *)CMSG_DATA(cm) = 0;
msg.msg_name = NULL;
msg.msg_namelen = 0;
msg.msg_iov = NULL;
msg.msg_iovlen = 0;
msg.msg_control = control;
msg.msg_controllen = cm->cmsg_len;
msg.msg_flags = 0;
fd = socket(AF_RXRPC, SOCK_DGRAM, AF_INET);
connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&srx, sizeof(srx));
sendmsg(fd, &msg, 0);
return 0;
}
Leading to the following oops:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
...
RIP: 0010:rxrpc_connect_call+0x42/0xa01
...
Call Trace:
? mark_held_locks+0x47/0x59
? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xb6/0xba
rxrpc_new_client_call+0x3b1/0x762
? rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0x3c0/0x92e
rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0x3c0/0x92e
rxrpc_sendmsg+0x16b/0x1b5
sock_sendmsg+0x2d/0x39
___sys_sendmsg+0x1a4/0x22a
? release_sock+0x19/0x9e
? reacquire_held_locks+0x136/0x160
? release_sock+0x19/0x9e
? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x6e
? __lock_acquire+0x268/0xf73
? rxrpc_connect+0xdd/0xe4
? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xb6/0xba
__sys_sendmsg+0x5e/0x94
do_syscall_64+0x7d/0x1bf
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
Fixes: 2341e0775747 ("rxrpc: Simplify connect() implementation and simplify sendmsg() op")
Reported-by: syzbot+7966f2a0b2c7da8939b4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
---
net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
index f9f4721cdfa7..d09eaf153544 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
@@ -545,6 +545,7 @@ static int rxrpc_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t len)
switch (rx->sk.sk_state) {
case RXRPC_UNBOUND:
+ case RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND:
rx->srx.srx_family = AF_RXRPC;
rx->srx.srx_service = 0;
rx->srx.transport_type = SOCK_DGRAM;
@@ -569,10 +570,9 @@ static int rxrpc_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t len)
}
rx->local = local;
- rx->sk.sk_state = RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND;
+ rx->sk.sk_state = RXRPC_CLIENT_BOUND;
/* Fall through */
- case RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND:
case RXRPC_CLIENT_BOUND:
if (!m->msg_name &&
test_bit(RXRPC_SOCK_CONNECTED, &rx->flags)) {
next reply other threads:[~2019-07-02 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-02 14:59 David Howells [this message]
2019-07-02 19:16 ` [PATCH net] rxrpc: Fix send on a connected, but unbound socket David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=156207955265.1655.13658692984261290810.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+7966f2a0b2c7da8939b4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).