Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] kasan: detect negative size in memory operation function

From: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] kasan: detect negative size in memory operation function
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:02:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1574341376.8338.4.camel@mtksdccf07> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <040479c3-6f96-91c6-1b1a-9f3e947dac06@virtuozzo.com>

On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 15:26 +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> 
> On 11/12/19 9:53 AM, Walter Wu wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
> > index 6814d6d6a023..4bfce0af881f 100644
> > --- a/mm/kasan/common.c
> > +++ b/mm/kasan/common.c
> > @@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kasan_check_write);
> >  #undef memset
> >  void *memset(void *addr, int c, size_t len)
> >  {
> > -	check_memory_region((unsigned long)addr, len, true, _RET_IP_);
> > +	if (!check_memory_region((unsigned long)addr, len, true, _RET_IP_))
> > +		return NULL;
> >  
> >  	return __memset(addr, c, len);
> >  }
> > @@ -110,8 +111,9 @@ void *memset(void *addr, int c, size_t len)
> >  #undef memmove
> >  void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t len)
> >  {
> > -	check_memory_region((unsigned long)src, len, false, _RET_IP_);
> > -	check_memory_region((unsigned long)dest, len, true, _RET_IP_);
> > +	if (!check_memory_region((unsigned long)src, len, false, _RET_IP_) ||
> > +	    !check_memory_region((unsigned long)dest, len, true, _RET_IP_))
> > +		return NULL;
> >  
> >  	return __memmove(dest, src, len);
> >  }
> > @@ -119,8 +121,9 @@ void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t len)
> >  #undef memcpy
> >  void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t len)
> >  {
> > -	check_memory_region((unsigned long)src, len, false, _RET_IP_);
> > -	check_memory_region((unsigned long)dest, len, true, _RET_IP_);
> > +	if (!check_memory_region((unsigned long)src, len, false, _RET_IP_) ||
> > +	    !check_memory_region((unsigned long)dest, len, true, _RET_IP_))
> > +		return NULL;
> >  
> 
> I realized that we are going a wrong direction here. Entirely skipping mem*() operation on any
> poisoned shadow value might only make things worse. Some bugs just don't have any serious consequences,
> but skipping the mem*() ops entirely might introduce such consequences, which wouldn't happen otherwise.
> 
> So let's keep this code as this, no need to check the result of check_memory_region().
> 
> 
Ok, we just need to determine whether size is negative number. If yes
then KASAN produce report and continue to execute mem*(). right?