[PATCH 1/2] gpio: mvebu: use platform_irq_count

[PATCH 1/2] gpio: mvebu: use platform_irq_count

[Peng Fan]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---

V1:
 Code inspection, not tested

 drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
index 993bbeb3c006..ecfedcdadc0d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
@@ -46,7 +46,6 @@
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/pwm.h>
@@ -1102,7 +1101,7 @@ static int mvebu_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		soc_variant = MVEBU_GPIO_SOC_VARIANT_ORION;
 
 	/* Some gpio controllers do not provide irq support */
-	have_irqs = of_irq_count(np) != 0;
+	have_irqs = platform_irq_count(pdev) != 0;
 
 	mvchip = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct mvebu_gpio_chip),
 			      GFP_KERNEL);
-- 
2.16.4

[PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count

[Peng Fan]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---

V1:
 Code inspection, not tested

 drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
index 4122683eb1f9..c50721980a7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
 #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
@@ -586,7 +585,7 @@ static int bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
 	chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
-	kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
+	kona_gpio->num_bank = platform_irq_count(pdev);
 	if (kona_gpio->num_bank == 0) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Couldn't determine # GPIO banks\n");
 		return -ENOENT;
-- 
2.16.4

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 06:04:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> 
> V1:
>  Code inspection, not tested
> 
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> index 4122683eb1f9..c50721980a7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> -#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>  #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> @@ -586,7 +585,7 @@ static int bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
>  	chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
> -	kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
> +	kona_gpio->num_bank = platform_irq_count(pdev);

of_irq_count returns 0 or a positive int while platform_irq_count might
return a negative error code. This needs handling. Also I wonder why
platform_irq_count() is better than of_irq_count() which would be good
to describe in the commit log.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

RE: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count

[Peng Fan]

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count
> 
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 06:04:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >
> > Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >
> > V1:
> >  Code inspection, not tested
> >
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c index 4122683eb1f9..c50721980a7c
> 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> >  #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > -#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> >  #include <linux/init.h>
> >  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> >  #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> @@ -586,7 +585,7 @@ static int
> > bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> >  	kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
> >  	chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
> > -	kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
> > +	kona_gpio->num_bank = platform_irq_count(pdev);
> 
> of_irq_count returns 0 or a positive int while platform_irq_count might return
> a negative error code. This needs handling. Also I wonder why
> platform_irq_count() is better than of_irq_count() which would be good to
> describe in the commit log.

Inspired from https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/18/466
From Rob:
"
So I started looking at why you are using of_irq_count which drivers
shouldn't need to. In patch 5 you use it to allocate memory to store
the irq names, then use them here...
"

Is this ok?

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König
> |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 |
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> pengutronix.de%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C36e86
> 59eca384830eee508d777be21cc%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635
> %7C0%7C0%7C637109530809227993&amp;sdata=y95EHGlmw12IVVlWoiUiS
> cQzO7GIBjQmnAfYrtd7P6k%3D&amp;reserved=0 |

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 07:00:40AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 06:04:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > >
> > > Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > V1:
> > >  Code inspection, not tested
> > >
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c | 3 +--
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c index 4122683eb1f9..c50721980a7c
> > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> > >  #include <linux/io.h>
> > >  #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> > >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > -#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > >  #include <linux/init.h>
> > >  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > >  #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> @@ -586,7 +585,7 @@ static int
> > > bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >
> > >  	kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
> > >  	chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
> > > -	kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
> > > +	kona_gpio->num_bank = platform_irq_count(pdev);
> > 
> > of_irq_count returns 0 or a positive int while platform_irq_count might return
> > a negative error code. This needs handling. Also I wonder why
> > platform_irq_count() is better than of_irq_count() which would be good to
> > describe in the commit log.
> 
> Inspired from https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/18/466
> From Rob:
> "
> So I started looking at why you are using of_irq_count which drivers
> shouldn't need to. In patch 5 you use it to allocate memory to store
> the irq names, then use them here...
> "
> 
> Is this ok?

I would say something like:

	platform_irq_count() is the more generic way (independent of
	device trees) to determine the count of available interrupts. So
	use this instead.

	As platform_irq_count() might return an error code (which
	of_irq_count doesn't) some additional handling is necessary.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

RE: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count

[Peng Fan]

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count
> 
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 07:00:40AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 06:04:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > >
> > > > Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > V1:
> > > >  Code inspection, not tested
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c | 3 +--
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c index 4122683eb1f9..c50721980a7c
> > > 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > > @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> > > >  #include <linux/io.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > > -#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/init.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> @@ -586,7 +585,7 @@ static
> > > > int bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > >
> > > >  	kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
> > > >  	chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
> > > > -	kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
> > > > +	kona_gpio->num_bank = platform_irq_count(pdev);
> > >
> > > of_irq_count returns 0 or a positive int while platform_irq_count
> > > might return a negative error code. This needs handling. Also I
> > > wonder why
> > > platform_irq_count() is better than of_irq_count() which would be
> > > good to describe in the commit log.
> >
> > Inspired from
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flkml
> > .org%2Flkml%2F2015%2F11%2F18%2F466&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.f
> an%40nxp.c
> >
> om%7C46364bf12479463df7d308d777c09b39%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd9
> 9c5c3016
> >
> 35%7C0%7C0%7C637109541440912984&amp;sdata=awTvwwmo4692Hx7IJ
> H%2BllEVJH7
> > ngINufoMH8UsosU%2BA%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > From Rob:
> > "
> > So I started looking at why you are using of_irq_count which drivers
> > shouldn't need to. In patch 5 you use it to allocate memory to store
> > the irq names, then use them here...
> > "
> >
> > Is this ok?
> 
> I would say something like:
> 
> 	platform_irq_count() is the more generic way (independent of
> 	device trees) to determine the count of available interrupts. So
> 	use this instead.
> 
> 	As platform_irq_count() might return an error code (which
> 	of_irq_count doesn't) some additional handling is necessary.

Thanks, how about this change?
@@ -586,11 +585,15 @@ static int bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

        kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
        chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
-       kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
-       if (kona_gpio->num_bank == 0) {
+       ret = platform_irq_count(pdev);
+       if (!ret) {
                dev_err(dev, "Couldn't determine # GPIO banks\n");
                return -ENOENT;
+       } else if (ret < 0) {
+               return ret;
        }
+       kona_gpio->num_bank = ret;
+
        if (kona_gpio->num_bank > GPIO_MAX_BANK_NUM) {

Thanks,
Peng.
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König
> |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 |
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> pengutronix.de%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C46364
> bf12479463df7d308d777c09b39%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%
> 7C0%7C0%7C637109541440922981&amp;sdata=8zAFDgy56%2BjS4I4dUvB6
> y37AMHBu1PDdzESa6c2jUlc%3D&amp;reserved=0 |

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 07:23:14AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 07:00:40AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 06:04:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > V1:
> > > > >  Code inspection, not tested
> > > > >
> > > > >  drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c | 3 +--
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > > > b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c index 4122683eb1f9..c50721980a7c
> > > > 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > > > @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> > > > >  #include <linux/io.h>
> > > > >  #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> > > > >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > > > -#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > > > >  #include <linux/init.h>
> > > > >  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > > > >  #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> @@ -586,7 +585,7 @@ static
> > > > > int bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > >
> > > > >  	kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
> > > > >  	chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
> > > > > -	kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
> > > > > +	kona_gpio->num_bank = platform_irq_count(pdev);
> > > >
> > > > of_irq_count returns 0 or a positive int while platform_irq_count
> > > > might return a negative error code. This needs handling. Also I
> > > > wonder why
> > > > platform_irq_count() is better than of_irq_count() which would be
> > > > good to describe in the commit log.
> > >
> > > Inspired from
> > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flkml
> > > .org%2Flkml%2F2015%2F11%2F18%2F466&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.f
> > an%40nxp.c
> > >
> > om%7C46364bf12479463df7d308d777c09b39%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd9
> > 9c5c3016
> > >
> > 35%7C0%7C0%7C637109541440912984&amp;sdata=awTvwwmo4692Hx7IJ
> > H%2BllEVJH7
> > > ngINufoMH8UsosU%2BA%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > From Rob:
> > > "
> > > So I started looking at why you are using of_irq_count which drivers
> > > shouldn't need to. In patch 5 you use it to allocate memory to store
> > > the irq names, then use them here...
> > > "
> > >
> > > Is this ok?
> > 
> > I would say something like:
> > 
> > 	platform_irq_count() is the more generic way (independent of
> > 	device trees) to determine the count of available interrupts. So
> > 	use this instead.
> > 
> > 	As platform_irq_count() might return an error code (which
> > 	of_irq_count doesn't) some additional handling is necessary.
> 
> Thanks, how about this change?
> @@ -586,11 +585,15 @@ static int bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 
>         kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
>         chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
> -       kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
> -       if (kona_gpio->num_bank == 0) {
> +       ret = platform_irq_count(pdev);
> +       if (!ret) {
>                 dev_err(dev, "Couldn't determine # GPIO banks\n");
>                 return -ENOENT;
> +       } else if (ret < 0) {
> +               return ret;

This is inconsitent. In the ret==0 case you emit an error message, in
the ret < 0 case you don't. I think the sensible approach would be to
do:

	if (ret == 0) {
		dev_err(dev, "Couldn't determine # GPIO banks\n");
		return -ENOENT;
	} else if (ret < 0) {
		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
			dev_err(dev, "Failed to determine count of GPIO banks (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
		return ret;
	}

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

RE: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count

[Peng Fan]

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count
> 
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 07:23:14AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 07:00:40AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 06:04:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >
> > > > > > V1:
> > > > > >  Code inspection, not tested
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c | 3 +--
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c index
> > > > > > 4122683eb1f9..c50721980a7c
> > > > > 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > > > > @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> > > > > >  #include <linux/io.h>
> > > > > >  #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > > > > -#include <linux/of_irq.h>  #include <linux/init.h>  #include
> > > > > > <linux/irqdomain.h>  #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> @@
> > > > > > -586,7 +585,7 @@ static int bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct
> > > > > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  	kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
> > > > > >  	chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
> > > > > > -	kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
> > > > > > +	kona_gpio->num_bank = platform_irq_count(pdev);
> > > > >
> > > > > of_irq_count returns 0 or a positive int while
> > > > > platform_irq_count might return a negative error code. This
> > > > > needs handling. Also I wonder why
> > > > > platform_irq_count() is better than of_irq_count() which would
> > > > > be good to describe in the commit log.
> > > >
> > > > Inspired from
> > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> > > >
> lkml .org%2Flkml%2F2015%2F11%2F18%2F466&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpen
> g.f
> > > an%40nxp.c
> > > >
> > >
> om%7C46364bf12479463df7d308d777c09b39%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd9
> > > 9c5c3016
> > > >
> > >
> 35%7C0%7C0%7C637109541440912984&amp;sdata=awTvwwmo4692Hx7IJ
> > > H%2BllEVJH7
> > > > ngINufoMH8UsosU%2BA%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > > From Rob:
> > > > "
> > > > So I started looking at why you are using of_irq_count which
> > > > drivers shouldn't need to. In patch 5 you use it to allocate
> > > > memory to store the irq names, then use them here...
> > > > "
> > > >
> > > > Is this ok?
> > >
> > > I would say something like:
> > >
> > > 	platform_irq_count() is the more generic way (independent of
> > > 	device trees) to determine the count of available interrupts. So
> > > 	use this instead.
> > >
> > > 	As platform_irq_count() might return an error code (which
> > > 	of_irq_count doesn't) some additional handling is necessary.
> >
> > Thanks, how about this change?
> > @@ -586,11 +585,15 @@ static int bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> >
> >         kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
> >         chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
> > -       kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
> > -       if (kona_gpio->num_bank == 0) {
> > +       ret = platform_irq_count(pdev);
> > +       if (!ret) {
> >                 dev_err(dev, "Couldn't determine # GPIO banks\n");
> >                 return -ENOENT;
> > +       } else if (ret < 0) {
> > +               return ret;
> 
> This is inconsitent. In the ret==0 case you emit an error message, in the ret <
> 0 case you don't. I think the sensible approach would be to
> do:
> 
> 	if (ret == 0) {
!ret should be fine, I think checkpatch might trigger warning using ret == 0.
> 		dev_err(dev, "Couldn't determine # GPIO banks\n");
> 		return -ENOENT;
> 	} else if (ret < 0) {
> 		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> 			dev_err(dev, "Failed to determine count of GPIO banks
> (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> 		return ret;
> 	}

ok, will use this for v2.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König
> |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 |
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> pengutronix.de%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7Cab060
> 7335df3485a98e908d777c3d594%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635
> %7C0%7C0%7C637109555298587766&amp;sdata=9NTBkwRTIuFBF9y97jqyr
> b4Vym8FpvOTZYBrqJqEERk%3D&amp;reserved=0 |

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

wt., 3 gru 2019 o 07:57 Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> napisał(a):
>
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 06:04:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >
> > Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >
> > V1:
> >  Code inspection, not tested
> >
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > index 4122683eb1f9..c50721980a7c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> >  #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > -#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> >  #include <linux/init.h>
> >  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> >  #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> > @@ -586,7 +585,7 @@ static int bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> >       kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
> >       chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
> > -     kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
> > +     kona_gpio->num_bank = platform_irq_count(pdev);
>
> of_irq_count returns 0 or a positive int while platform_irq_count might
> return a negative error code. This needs handling. Also I wonder why
> platform_irq_count() is better than of_irq_count() which would be good
> to describe in the commit log.
>

In general I like drivers to use generic APIs whenever possible. There
are a lot of drivers that use some random of_ routines just because
the developer didn't know any better and it turns out we now have
generic device properties and a lot of platform device helpers.
Consolidation is always good.

Waiting for v2.

> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: mvebu: use platform_irq_count

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 7:04 AM Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> wrote:

> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>
> V1:
>  Code inspection, not tested

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: mvebu: use platform_irq_count

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 7:04 AM Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >
> > Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >
> > V1:
> >  Code inspection, not tested
>
> Patch applied.

Oops dropped again now that I see there are comments on
2/2 that warrants a v2 of this as well.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: mvebu: use platform_irq_count

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

czw., 12 gru 2019 o 16:31 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> napisał(a):
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 7:04 AM Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > >
> > > Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > V1:
> > >  Code inspection, not tested
> >
> > Patch applied.
>
> Oops dropped again now that I see there are comments on
> 2/2 that warrants a v2 of this as well.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Linus,

FYI I picked up v3 of this series into my tree.

Bart