From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C67BC11D2F for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119172082F for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:14:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582557261; bh=fjrJ1bXxE6cy57s9WJjc99A+mzqTea0xUG76BrG1oBA=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=EBe+VKy834S80fpwOOPvwW02xkH1krXnirElcavh1uzFgvFtOcgvoJT1SF1wlgsyf k+tRlEYLJmpul33X3DnqHMICBOgjX38G6vIjHxa//oHllZR0I+fSiHc3PTCKXJBx3+ wxn9Uwt7E8HUWbTtDTcqy8ZwO50Dci50veY26JiY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727803AbgBXPOT (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:14:19 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41932 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727299AbgBXPOT (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:14:19 -0500 Received: from tzanussi-mobl7 (c-98-220-238-81.hsd1.il.comcast.net [98.220.238.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5528A20828; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:14:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582557259; bh=fjrJ1bXxE6cy57s9WJjc99A+mzqTea0xUG76BrG1oBA=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mQVtAWY1hnbrVbe9qoer+1isR+6YqCZgdwgQx7lcCG5b0gcFdqTRxAwB0WPJqc7Hd 8Sn6ionAWL5lPuB1Ve317rNIgnz+Sl+euEvXyVARyV2H3t9VhuzJYRjJBtmRtLzEPn kap9YCccoUxLEf4baQFZjyHIRyv7uUJeOZQVu9aU= Message-ID: <1582557257.12738.19.camel@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 19/25] userfaultfd: Use a seqlock instead of seqcount From: Tom Zanussi To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: LKML , linux-rt-users , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Carsten Emde , John Kacur , Daniel Wagner Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:14:17 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20200224090317.shfeuxfukkvxvqaf@linutronix.de> References: <889f5b989b28eb7b29f21092432948cd12d97c48.1582320278.git.zanussi@kernel.org> <20200224090317.shfeuxfukkvxvqaf@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.1-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 10:03 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2020-02-21 15:24:47 [-0600], zanussi@kernel.org wrote: > > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > > > > v4.14.170-rt75-rc1 stable review patch. > > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > This is required but it is not part of the next "higher" tree > (v4.19-RT). Which means if someone moves from v4.14-RT to the next > tree > (v4.19-RT in this case) that someone would have the bug again. > > Could you please wait with such patches or did the I miss the v4.19- > RT > tree with this change? > No, you didn't miss the 4.19 tree with this change - I got a little ahead of 4.19 this time. Will drop all the patches ahead of 4.19. Thanks, Tom > Sebastian