linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Eric W. Biederman" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: timers/core] posix-cpu-timers: Remove unnecessary locking around cpu_clock_sample_group
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 20:49:52 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <158300939224.28353.11896978071941864945.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)

The following commit has been merged into the timers/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     2cb7eb58997191978f524a4e76e33f5953136243
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/2cb7eb58997191978f524a4e76e33f5953136243
Author:        Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
AuthorDate:    Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:09:19 -06:00
Committer:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 21:44:45 +01:00

posix-cpu-timers: Remove unnecessary locking around cpu_clock_sample_group

As of e78c3496790e ("time, signal: Protect resource use statistics
with seqlock") cpu_clock_sample_group no longers needs siglock
protection.  Unfortunately no one realized it at the time.

Remove the extra locking that is for cpu_clock_sample_group and not
for cpu_clock_sample.  This significantly simplifies the code.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

---
 kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 66 ++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 46cc188..40c2d83 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -718,31 +718,10 @@ static void posix_cpu_timer_get(struct k_itimer *timer, struct itimerspec64 *itp
 	/*
 	 * Sample the clock to take the difference with the expiry time.
 	 */
-	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock)) {
+	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock))
 		now = cpu_clock_sample(clkid, p);
-	} else {
-		struct sighand_struct *sighand;
-		unsigned long flags;
-
-		/*
-		 * Protect against sighand release/switch in exit/exec and
-		 * also make timer sampling safe if it ends up calling
-		 * thread_group_cputime().
-		 */
-		sighand = lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
-		if (unlikely(sighand == NULL)) {
-			/*
-			 * The process has been reaped.
-			 * We can't even collect a sample any more.
-			 * Disarm the timer, nothing else to do.
-			 */
-			cpu_timer_setexpires(ctmr, 0);
-			return;
-		} else {
-			now = cpu_clock_sample_group(clkid, p, false);
-			unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
-		}
-	}
+	else
+		now = cpu_clock_sample_group(clkid, p, false);
 
 	if (now < expires) {
 		itp->it_value = ns_to_timespec64(expires - now);
@@ -986,43 +965,22 @@ static void posix_cpu_timer_rearm(struct k_itimer *timer)
 	/*
 	 * Fetch the current sample and update the timer's expiry time.
 	 */
-	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock)) {
+	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock))
 		now = cpu_clock_sample(clkid, p);
-		bump_cpu_timer(timer, now);
-		if (unlikely(p->exit_state))
-			return;
-
-		/* Protect timer list r/w in arm_timer() */
-		sighand = lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
-		if (!sighand)
-			return;
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * Protect arm_timer() and timer sampling in case of call to
-		 * thread_group_cputime().
-		 */
-		sighand = lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
-		if (unlikely(sighand == NULL)) {
-			/*
-			 * The process has been reaped.
-			 * We can't even collect a sample any more.
-			 */
-			cpu_timer_setexpires(ctmr, 0);
-			return;
-		} else if (unlikely(p->exit_state) && thread_group_empty(p)) {
-			/* If the process is dying, no need to rearm */
-			goto unlock;
-		}
+	else
 		now = cpu_clock_sample_group(clkid, p, true);
-		bump_cpu_timer(timer, now);
-		/* Leave the sighand locked for the call below.  */
-	}
+
+	bump_cpu_timer(timer, now);
+
+	/* Protect timer list r/w in arm_timer() */
+	sighand = lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
+	if (unlikely(sighand == NULL))
+		return;
 
 	/*
 	 * Now re-arm for the new expiry time.
 	 */
 	arm_timer(timer);
-unlock:
 	unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
 }
 

             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-29 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-29 20:49 tip-bot2 for Eric W. Biederman [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-28 17:09 [PATCH 2/5] posix-cpu-timers: Remove unnecessary locking around cpu_clock_sample_group Eric W. Biederman
2020-03-01 10:27 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=158300939224.28353.11896978071941864945.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).