linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yong Mao <yong.mao@mediatek.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	yong mao <yong.mao@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mmc: mediatek: fix SDIO irq issue
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:51:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1585299097-6897-2-git-send-email-yong.mao@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1585299097-6897-1-git-send-email-yong.mao@mediatek.com>

From: yong mao <yong.mao@mediatek.com>

SDIO irq is not triggered by low level, but by falling edge in our
previous IC. This mechanism only have one chance to catch the SDIO irq
if a SDIO irq comes within the multiple block transmission. This SDIO
irq may be easily lost, because falling edge appears only once within 2
clock after data transmission is completed.

SDIO irq recheck mechanism will make sure all irqs can be
processed correctly.

Signed-off-by: Yong Mao <yong.mao@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
index 7726dcf..b221c02 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@
 #define MSDC_PS_CDSTS           (0x1 << 1)	/* R  */
 #define MSDC_PS_CDDEBOUNCE      (0xf << 12)	/* RW */
 #define MSDC_PS_DAT             (0xff << 16)	/* R  */
+#define MSDC_PS_DATA1           (0x1 << 17)	/* R  */
 #define MSDC_PS_CMD             (0x1 << 24)	/* R  */
 #define MSDC_PS_WP              (0x1 << 31)	/* R  */
 
@@ -361,6 +362,7 @@ struct msdc_save_para {
 
 struct mtk_mmc_compatible {
 	u8 clk_div_bits;
+	bool recheck_sdio_irq;
 	bool hs400_tune; /* only used for MT8173 */
 	u32 pad_tune_reg;
 	bool async_fifo;
@@ -436,6 +438,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
 
 static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8135_compat = {
 	.clk_div_bits = 8,
+	.recheck_sdio_irq = false,
 	.hs400_tune = false,
 	.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE,
 	.async_fifo = false,
@@ -448,6 +451,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
 
 static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8173_compat = {
 	.clk_div_bits = 8,
+	.recheck_sdio_irq = true,
 	.hs400_tune = true,
 	.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE,
 	.async_fifo = false,
@@ -460,6 +464,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
 
 static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8183_compat = {
 	.clk_div_bits = 12,
+	.recheck_sdio_irq = false,
 	.hs400_tune = false,
 	.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE0,
 	.async_fifo = true,
@@ -472,6 +477,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
 
 static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2701_compat = {
 	.clk_div_bits = 12,
+	.recheck_sdio_irq = false,
 	.hs400_tune = false,
 	.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE0,
 	.async_fifo = true,
@@ -484,6 +490,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
 
 static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2712_compat = {
 	.clk_div_bits = 12,
+	.recheck_sdio_irq = false,
 	.hs400_tune = false,
 	.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE0,
 	.async_fifo = true,
@@ -496,6 +503,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
 
 static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt7622_compat = {
 	.clk_div_bits = 12,
+	.recheck_sdio_irq = false,
 	.hs400_tune = false,
 	.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE0,
 	.async_fifo = true,
@@ -508,6 +516,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
 
 static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8516_compat = {
 	.clk_div_bits = 12,
+	.recheck_sdio_irq = false,
 	.hs400_tune = false,
 	.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE0,
 	.async_fifo = true,
@@ -518,6 +527,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
 
 static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt7620_compat = {
 	.clk_div_bits = 8,
+	.recheck_sdio_irq = false,
 	.hs400_tune = false,
 	.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE,
 	.async_fifo = false,
@@ -591,6 +601,7 @@ static void msdc_reset_hw(struct msdc_host *host)
 
 static void msdc_cmd_next(struct msdc_host *host,
 		struct mmc_request *mrq, struct mmc_command *cmd);
+static void __msdc_enable_sdio_irq(struct msdc_host *host, int enb);
 
 static const u32 cmd_ints_mask = MSDC_INTEN_CMDRDY | MSDC_INTEN_RSPCRCERR |
 			MSDC_INTEN_CMDTMO | MSDC_INTEN_ACMDRDY |
@@ -1007,6 +1018,32 @@ static int msdc_auto_cmd_done(struct msdc_host *host, int events,
 	return cmd->error;
 }
 
+/**
+ * msdc_recheck_sdio_irq - recheck whether the SDIO irq is lost
+ *
+ * Host controller may lost interrupt in some special case.
+ * Add SDIO irq recheck mechanism to make sure all interrupts
+ * can be processed immediately
+ *
+ */
+static void msdc_recheck_sdio_irq(struct msdc_host *host)
+{
+	u32 reg_int, reg_inten, reg_ps;
+
+	if (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
+		reg_inten = readl(host->base + MSDC_INTEN);
+		if (reg_inten & MSDC_INTEN_SDIOIRQ) {
+			reg_int = readl(host->base + MSDC_INT);
+			reg_ps = readl(host->base + MSDC_PS);
+			if (!(reg_int & MSDC_INT_SDIOIRQ ||
+			      reg_ps & MSDC_PS_DATA1)) {
+				__msdc_enable_sdio_irq(host, 0);
+				sdio_signal_irq(host->mmc);
+			}
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 static void msdc_track_cmd_data(struct msdc_host *host,
 				struct mmc_command *cmd, struct mmc_data *data)
 {
@@ -1035,6 +1072,8 @@ static void msdc_request_done(struct msdc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
 	if (host->error)
 		msdc_reset_hw(host);
 	mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq);
+	if (host->dev_comp->recheck_sdio_irq)
+		msdc_recheck_sdio_irq(host);
 }
 
 /* returns true if command is fully handled; returns false otherwise */
@@ -1393,6 +1432,8 @@ static void __msdc_enable_sdio_irq(struct msdc_host *host, int enb)
 	if (enb) {
 		sdr_set_bits(host->base + MSDC_INTEN, MSDC_INTEN_SDIOIRQ);
 		sdr_set_bits(host->base + SDC_CFG, SDC_CFG_SDIOIDE);
+		if (host->dev_comp->recheck_sdio_irq)
+			msdc_recheck_sdio_irq(host);
 	} else {
 		sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_INTEN, MSDC_INTEN_SDIOIRQ);
 		sdr_clr_bits(host->base + SDC_CFG, SDC_CFG_SDIOIDE);
-- 
1.9.1

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-27  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-27  8:51 [PATCH v2] mmc: mediatek: fix SDIO irq issue Yong Mao
2020-03-27  8:51 ` Yong Mao [this message]
2020-03-27 12:27   ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1585299097-6897-2-git-send-email-yong.mao@mediatek.com \
    --to=yong.mao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).