From: Yong Mao <yong.mao@mediatek.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
<linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
yong mao <yong.mao@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mmc: mediatek: fix SDIO irq issue
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:51:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1585299097-6897-2-git-send-email-yong.mao@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1585299097-6897-1-git-send-email-yong.mao@mediatek.com>
From: yong mao <yong.mao@mediatek.com>
SDIO irq is not triggered by low level, but by falling edge in our
previous IC. This mechanism only have one chance to catch the SDIO irq
if a SDIO irq comes within the multiple block transmission. This SDIO
irq may be easily lost, because falling edge appears only once within 2
clock after data transmission is completed.
SDIO irq recheck mechanism will make sure all irqs can be
processed correctly.
Signed-off-by: Yong Mao <yong.mao@mediatek.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
index 7726dcf..b221c02 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@
#define MSDC_PS_CDSTS (0x1 << 1) /* R */
#define MSDC_PS_CDDEBOUNCE (0xf << 12) /* RW */
#define MSDC_PS_DAT (0xff << 16) /* R */
+#define MSDC_PS_DATA1 (0x1 << 17) /* R */
#define MSDC_PS_CMD (0x1 << 24) /* R */
#define MSDC_PS_WP (0x1 << 31) /* R */
@@ -361,6 +362,7 @@ struct msdc_save_para {
struct mtk_mmc_compatible {
u8 clk_div_bits;
+ bool recheck_sdio_irq;
bool hs400_tune; /* only used for MT8173 */
u32 pad_tune_reg;
bool async_fifo;
@@ -436,6 +438,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8135_compat = {
.clk_div_bits = 8,
+ .recheck_sdio_irq = false,
.hs400_tune = false,
.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE,
.async_fifo = false,
@@ -448,6 +451,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8173_compat = {
.clk_div_bits = 8,
+ .recheck_sdio_irq = true,
.hs400_tune = true,
.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE,
.async_fifo = false,
@@ -460,6 +464,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8183_compat = {
.clk_div_bits = 12,
+ .recheck_sdio_irq = false,
.hs400_tune = false,
.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE0,
.async_fifo = true,
@@ -472,6 +477,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2701_compat = {
.clk_div_bits = 12,
+ .recheck_sdio_irq = false,
.hs400_tune = false,
.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE0,
.async_fifo = true,
@@ -484,6 +490,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2712_compat = {
.clk_div_bits = 12,
+ .recheck_sdio_irq = false,
.hs400_tune = false,
.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE0,
.async_fifo = true,
@@ -496,6 +503,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt7622_compat = {
.clk_div_bits = 12,
+ .recheck_sdio_irq = false,
.hs400_tune = false,
.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE0,
.async_fifo = true,
@@ -508,6 +516,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8516_compat = {
.clk_div_bits = 12,
+ .recheck_sdio_irq = false,
.hs400_tune = false,
.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE0,
.async_fifo = true,
@@ -518,6 +527,7 @@ struct msdc_host {
static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt7620_compat = {
.clk_div_bits = 8,
+ .recheck_sdio_irq = false,
.hs400_tune = false,
.pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE,
.async_fifo = false,
@@ -591,6 +601,7 @@ static void msdc_reset_hw(struct msdc_host *host)
static void msdc_cmd_next(struct msdc_host *host,
struct mmc_request *mrq, struct mmc_command *cmd);
+static void __msdc_enable_sdio_irq(struct msdc_host *host, int enb);
static const u32 cmd_ints_mask = MSDC_INTEN_CMDRDY | MSDC_INTEN_RSPCRCERR |
MSDC_INTEN_CMDTMO | MSDC_INTEN_ACMDRDY |
@@ -1007,6 +1018,32 @@ static int msdc_auto_cmd_done(struct msdc_host *host, int events,
return cmd->error;
}
+/**
+ * msdc_recheck_sdio_irq - recheck whether the SDIO irq is lost
+ *
+ * Host controller may lost interrupt in some special case.
+ * Add SDIO irq recheck mechanism to make sure all interrupts
+ * can be processed immediately
+ *
+ */
+static void msdc_recheck_sdio_irq(struct msdc_host *host)
+{
+ u32 reg_int, reg_inten, reg_ps;
+
+ if (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
+ reg_inten = readl(host->base + MSDC_INTEN);
+ if (reg_inten & MSDC_INTEN_SDIOIRQ) {
+ reg_int = readl(host->base + MSDC_INT);
+ reg_ps = readl(host->base + MSDC_PS);
+ if (!(reg_int & MSDC_INT_SDIOIRQ ||
+ reg_ps & MSDC_PS_DATA1)) {
+ __msdc_enable_sdio_irq(host, 0);
+ sdio_signal_irq(host->mmc);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
static void msdc_track_cmd_data(struct msdc_host *host,
struct mmc_command *cmd, struct mmc_data *data)
{
@@ -1035,6 +1072,8 @@ static void msdc_request_done(struct msdc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
if (host->error)
msdc_reset_hw(host);
mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq);
+ if (host->dev_comp->recheck_sdio_irq)
+ msdc_recheck_sdio_irq(host);
}
/* returns true if command is fully handled; returns false otherwise */
@@ -1393,6 +1432,8 @@ static void __msdc_enable_sdio_irq(struct msdc_host *host, int enb)
if (enb) {
sdr_set_bits(host->base + MSDC_INTEN, MSDC_INTEN_SDIOIRQ);
sdr_set_bits(host->base + SDC_CFG, SDC_CFG_SDIOIDE);
+ if (host->dev_comp->recheck_sdio_irq)
+ msdc_recheck_sdio_irq(host);
} else {
sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_INTEN, MSDC_INTEN_SDIOIRQ);
sdr_clr_bits(host->base + SDC_CFG, SDC_CFG_SDIOIDE);
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-27 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-27 8:51 [PATCH v2] mmc: mediatek: fix SDIO irq issue Yong Mao
2020-03-27 8:51 ` Yong Mao [this message]
2020-03-27 12:27 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1585299097-6897-2-git-send-email-yong.mao@mediatek.com \
--to=yong.mao@mediatek.com \
--cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).